A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The following recommendation suggests that a country should mandate all students to study the same national cirriculum in their primary and secondary education levels. However, this recommndation is not objective for numerous reasons discussed in this essay.
The recommendation is bias and not germane especailly for democratic nations. Education, though intrinsic in value, can be considered a consumer good to some extent. Parents, in a relatively developed country seeks to expose their children to the best education system available. In that regard, then this recommendation would rob the society of their freedom to choose, the primary tenet of democracy as well as a right all humans should enjoy. The recommendation the is not logic for nations seeking to forster freedom fo its denizens.
Foreigners would be restricted by the recommendation in question. Inevitably, there are foreigners living abroad for many reasons and variating time periods, among them, there are those with their families who prefer to take their children through their foreign curriculum and not that of the nation they are in. Therefore, as aforementioned, this would restrict them. To elaborate, Kenya, a developing country, has alot of foreigners (such as Americans, Europeans and Asians just to name a few) working in their country, together with their families, the foreigners are priviledged with the opportunity to choose from a variety of curriculums. Should such a recommendation considered in Kenya, some of these expats would feel restricted and may consider not living in Kenya in the first place.
Ultimately, if the nations curriculum was eminent, then it would be worthless lobbying such a recommendation as undoubtely, the citizens of the nation would prefer the their national curriculum to anything else. Individuals are likely to choose the best option, having said that then, pushing for that recommendation would only imply that the curriculum is not effecient.
In conclusion, the recommendation should not be considered as it is bias and pedestrian. Thus, nationals should have the priviledge and a right to choose.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o choose, the primary tenet of democracy as well as a right all humans should enj...
^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'human'?
Suggestion: human
...et of democracy as well as a right all humans should enjoy. The recommendation the is...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... the first place. Ultimately, if the nations curriculum was eminent, then it would b...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...the citizens of the nation would prefer the their national curriculum to anything else. I...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 2260.96107784 80% => OK
No of words: 329.0 441.139720559 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48936170213 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15016523174 2.78398813304 113% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 204.123752495 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516717325228 0.468620217663 110% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 705.55239521 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2924909542 57.8364921388 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.875 119.503703932 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5625 23.324526521 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.70786347227 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213054397681 0.218282227539 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743717979873 0.0743258471296 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548765679718 0.0701772020484 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137293324921 0.128457276422 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393599618697 0.0628817314937 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.3550499002 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.5979740519 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 98.500998004 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.