Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The claim that technology make lives complicated does true. Primarily, technology undoubtedly has made lives easier rather than complicated across the globe. However, it is worth acknowledging the side effects posed by technology. The benefits and disadvantages of technology are not entirely commensurate as the benefits outweigh these challenges.
The 21st century is marked by the most innovative and revolutionary technology in the history of man. Quotidian activities are achieved in mili seconds. Consider, commuting to work 40km away from home within probably 30 minutes duration, or travelling from continent to continent in less than a 24hour period, effectively relaying information from one person to the other in milliseconds. All these have been made possible by technology. Today, technology has revolutionalized the transport telecommunication sectors making lives sipmler. Thus the claim that life has been complicated is invalid as without technology, resources and time would not be saved.
Building up on the fact that technology has made lives easier, the burden of day to day ardous work has been lifted by technology. For instance, washing machines have simplified the luandering, Staircases have been replaced by elevators and escalators, just but to mention afew. The fact that life is easier and enjoyable with technology cannot be emphasised further. Considering the milestones achieved by the human race through technology, indeed their live have improved for the better in all facets of life. In that respcet, then the statement is bias and does not hold true.
In addition, technology has advanced the medical field. Scientists in the past have completely eradicated small pox, a deadly disease, from the face of the earth. They saved lives of millions then and now. Through technology, this has been possible among other solutions.
However, it cannot be argued that technology free of any faults. In essence, technology has possed threats to human life such as pollution of the environment, enchroachment of the wildlife and its ecosystem, cancer is also on the rise. These challenges have propmted action across the globe with intensive research undertaken. For instance, the invention of electronic automobiles, has impacted the effort of non-renewable energy conservation, notwithstanding, they have also exposed its users to cancer, an incurable disease. In this case the, the calim is valid.
In conclusion, the author of the claim should not entirely disregard the benefits of technology to the human race. Instead, they should acknowledge the benefits and outline its downsides as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...unication sectors making lives sipmler. Thus the claim that life has been complicate...
^^^^
Line 9, column 541, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
...cer, an incurable disease. In this case the, the calim is valid. In conclusion, t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, then, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2237.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55086848635 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09996773362 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0458976815 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0384615385 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.96153846154 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0677286891694 0.243740707755 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0200070364763 0.0831039109588 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.020054793417 0.0758088955206 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0348944356008 0.150359130593 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248465465837 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.