A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how those examples shape your position.
In many nations atleast in India there were multiple states and multiple languages for each state with seperate cirriculum for each state. Due to this there were many drawacks in terms of cost incurred, uniform standards across all states etc. Firstly, there will be uniformity of education across the nation. In a country there might be different states having different perceptions on the cirrciculum they have to stick with for their students and due to these different perceptions some states will employ a cirriculum worse than others and vice versa.Indeed there were backward regions which donot have expertise staff, as in developed states, to prepare proper cirriculum for students. If in case the complete nation have one cirriculum then there will be synchronisation of cirriculum across states of nation without making one state's cirriculum far better and efficient than other. Finally, with a single national cirriculum a lot of time will be saved for students before they enter college as they do not spend up time in studying their local languages and as well the understanding of a subjects like maths, physics and chemistry will be in same language across all states where by there will not be any confusion of terms when one person of one state interacts with an other person of different state. To delineate, for one (kannada) language speaking state there will be all subjects as per the cirriculum followed by other (Tamil) language speaking state in the same nation with minor variations but the language of the discussion is different and apart from national language the students also need to study their local (Kannada and Tamil) languages as well. In case of a unique national cirrculum a significant amount of time will be reduced and students can use the time in learning other important aspects. However having different cirriculum in each state is worthy as it gives student to involve more into the subject with his/her local language instead taking time to translate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 556, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Indeed
...iculum worse than others and vice versa.Indeed there were backward regions which donot...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 556, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...iculum worse than others and vice versa.Indeed there were backward regions which donot...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1184, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereby'?
Suggestion: whereby
...l be in same language across all states where by there will not be any confusion of term...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1278, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
... one person of one state interacts with an other person of different state. To delineate...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1819, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...me in learning other important aspects. However having different cirriculum in each sta...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, well, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 328.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0762195122 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62788431096 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478658536585 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 23.0359550562 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 123.038486401 60.3974514979 204% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 185.0 118.986275619 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.4444444444 23.4991977007 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.21951772744 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146573104475 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723165771289 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320551502252 0.0758088955206 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146573104475 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 14.1392134831 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.1743820225 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.2143820225 146% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.