I disagree with the author's recommendation. A nation should not require all students to study same national cirriculum until they enter collge.
While it might be possible that single national cirriculum is suitable for some students, for many students the cirriculum will not be mostly suitable. This is because there will be students of different IQ levels and different abilities of learning. Let us check with some real scenario in which there are two pupils namely John and Chris whose IQ score is 99% and 45% accordingly. For John he will be able to adjust to any type of national cirriculum. In contrast as per the IQ level of Chris, he cannot be adjusted to any type of cirriculum and need a specific cirrculum suitable for students of low IQ. Now we may think that we can have a single national cirriculum as John can adjust to the cirrculum designed for IQ level of Chris. However, for John designed will be a cakewalk and very unsuitable as per his ability. For instance what if a grade ten student is being taught grade 5 level mathematics he will feel bored. Conversly, if we do not have single national cirriculum then students of different abilities of learning will have a cirriculum as per their abily and grasping power.
Secondly, if students have no single cirriculum then there is one more advantage. When students enter college there can be a exchange of diverse ideas among students as cirriculum of the students before they enter college is different. Nonetheless we may also think that if single national cirriculum is maintained then there also will be exchange of diverse ideas among the students as the student perception is different. But in actuality there will be a wide range of ideas among students if there are multiple cirriculums as per student IQ level.
Constrastingly, if we have a single national cirriculum covering all students there can be a single proper cirrculum which is a balanced cirriculum for all students and also there can be possibility that teachers need not be accustomed to different cirriculums.
Conclusively, A nation should not require all students to study same national cirriculum until they enter collge because f student understanding and
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
I disagree with the authors recommendation. A nation should not req...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich there are two pupils namely John and Chris whose IQ score is 99% and 45% acco...
^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... to any type of national cirriculum. In contrast as per the IQ level of Chris, he cannot...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 859, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'student' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'students'.
Suggestion: students
...ility. For instance what if a grade ten student is being taught grade 5 level mathemati...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hen students enter college there can be a exchange of diverse ideas among student...
^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nonetheless,
...before they enter college is different. Nonetheless we may also think that if single nation...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... different cirriculums. Conclusively, A nation should not require all students...
^^
Line 9, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llge because f student understanding and
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, then, while, for instance, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 370.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99459459459 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85738442055 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.416216216216 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 597.6 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6269822802 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.705882353 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7647058824 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209086722415 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100688636445 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106614715272 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218783436163 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134801334827 0.0667264976115 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 100.480337079 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.