A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Essay topics:

A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Whether or not a nation requires same curriculum for all its students until they enter college is indeed a debatable issue. In my point of view, all students need to study same curriculum until they reach certain level. However, it may have negative impact on some students if we superimposes same curriculum to all students. Education is the key for the development of a nation. Education system of a country shapes the future of its citizens. So, government authorities should give immense importance on building national curriculum. A unified curriculum is required until certain level so that it would be easier for the government to meet educational goals. Similarly, it would be from students’ point of views.

First, every students need to have basic education that would help them develop a sense of conscience. It is mandatory that all students should have knowledge about standard social norms and etiquette. In order to instill such values, government should carry out a unified national curriculum. For example, every student will pursue different careers in future; however, they all will live in the same community and should feel compatible to each other. It is incumbent upon government to instill a sense of patriotism to every citizen. To this end, a nation need unified curriculum.

Secondly, for the development of a nation, government should spend its budget as economically as possible. Without any doubt, government should divide a large proportion of its budget in education. A unified national curriculum could save the government millions of dollars. To carry out different curriculum for the same contingent of the students, government need to established more infrastructure and should hire more teachers which adds to the government expenditure. For example, in my country Nepal, Nepal has implemented a unified national curriculum until high school level, it has initiated a program nationwide to increase enrolment of students and all educational indicators are showing progress in education.

Moreover, students are unable to decide which course to pursue until they enter the college. So, government should design curriculum that makes students capable of pursuing college education. Before going to college level education, student will have ample time to consider their future ways. For example, before the college level education, students reach their maturity so they are now able to make choices according to their interest and will do well in future.

Admittedly, some may argue that same curriculum for the students with different abilities will not yield good output. However, pushing students into different fields of study by creating different curriculum before they are mature enough to pursue particular field would not produce a good result.

In conclusion, a unified national curriculum will not only help government to meet its educational goals, but also helps students by preparing them for college education.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not a nation requires same curriculum for a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'superimpose'
Suggestion: superimpose
... negative impact on some students if we superimposes same curriculum to all students. Educat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...y student will pursue different careers in future; however, they all will live in the sam...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 455, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ding to their interest and will do well in future. Admittedly, some may argue that sam...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f study by creating different curriculum before they are mature enough to pursue ...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reparing them for college education.
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2531.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 462.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47835497835 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8746096359 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465367965368 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 804.6 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1347683831 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3461538462 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7692307692 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53846153846 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466809828475 0.243740707755 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14347064004 0.0831039109588 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104468166169 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247009625614 0.150359130593 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121420998951 0.0667264976115 182% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.