A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college

Essay topics:

A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college

Nation is a word which denotes unity. It has huge significance to all citizens who come under a nation. An important influencing factor of a nation is their students. They are the future of that particular nation. When we talk about their curriculum, we should be very particular about that. That curriculum helps in grooming their life. Then, one of the most debatable topic is, Should they have same curriculum and if it is there, then at what extent?

Next thing is when you call a nation, it can be of any kind like communist, secular, etc. These factors are highly responsible to answer our question. Consider an example about India as a nation. It is a secular country. It has various cultures and at the same time language barriers are also there. In country like india, applying same curriculum as a compulsory solution will lead to clashes between communities.

Next example, I want to talk about is of China. They have common language wiz. mandarin. Cultural differences is minimal. Opting same curriculum as a compulsion will work for them. So, in that case it should not be compulsion for whole nation.

Now, talking about extent, before entering college most of them get aware of their interest which can help them to choose best for them. But sometime one wrong decision spoil their career. It becomes huge time loss and energy waste. Total agreement won't be justice to this topic. But slight changes in a common curriculum, considering specific community interest can work fine. And if you are leaving at student, A proper guide and assist should be provided to maximize their benefits which will help nation to grow and flourish.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... lead to clashes between communities. Next example, I want to talk about is of...
^^^^
Line 9, column 80, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Mandarin
...f China. They have common language wiz. mandarin. Cultural differences is minimal. Optin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... extent, before entering college most of them get aware of their interest which c...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, talking about

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 281.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90035587189 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55642372032 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590747330961 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 23.0359550562 48% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3715406031 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 57.375 118.986275619 48% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.7083333333 23.4991977007 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.58333333333 5.21951772744 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284117407585 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723488927592 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629415500403 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170703422798 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700345707255 0.0667264976115 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 14.1392134831 53% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 48.8420337079 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.96 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 11.2143820225 57% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.