A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how those examples shape your position.
Education is the hot button issue of the moment. The topic raises the controversial and complex issue of whether a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. Indisputably, one has to acknowledge the complex intricacies involved in a homogenous education system. These difficulties involve language barriers, inability to scale up the education standards in under-developed areas of the nation and lack of availability of professors to cope up with the upgraded national curriculum. Nonetheless, a common national curriculum will propel students to compete at the same platform. Subsequently, obviating any discrepancies in the quality of education available to students across the nation. Thus, I generally agree that a common national curriculum can act as a boon to the students of the country provided it is implemented properly without undue haste.
First of all, consider the impact a common national curriculum would have on the mindset of the students. To illustrate, let us look at an example of a student from a rural part of the country. Due to the nonavailability of good quality education, rural students feel indignant and often feel inferior while competing with the students of the developed and urban areas of the country. A common curriculum shall help students to break these shackles and incite a feeling of competency in them. Eventually, reducing the abnormalities of the education quality provided across the country.
Furthermore, the uniform national curriculum will help simplify the way examinations are conducted across the country. For example, consider a nation having a large number of education boards. In such a circumstance, each board will conduct its own examination. Thereby, due to lack of any common platform, it is generally difficult to judge the performance of the students of the country as the difficulty level varies with each education board. Thus, a common education board will help resolve this issue.
On the contrary, one cannot neglect the complexities that might arise due to the implementation of the common education board. In a vast country, each state might be speaking different languages. In such a situation, having a common education board can be a mountain breaking task. Also, a sudden spike in the quality of education of the under-developed areas of the country can be challenging to implement without proper monetary funds and availability of good quality teachers. However, with slow and paced out development the quality of education can be improved for the betterment of rural area students.
In conclusion, as the education of a country helps reap rich geographic dividends, a common education system will help achieve that goal. However, if not implemented properly it can have detrimental effects on the current education standards. Thereby, jeopardising the whole purpose of the initiative.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
.... For example, consider a nation having a large number of education boards. In such a circumstanc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 395, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'implementing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: implementing
...areas of the country can be challenging to implement without proper monetary funds and avail...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, thus, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2486.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41612200436 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14716722624 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474945533769 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 796.5 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5374515847 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.44 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.36 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171128452897 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549672931038 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835370050418 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964154504829 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100633411251 0.0667264976115 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.