A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Essay topics:

A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

For every schools there is a syllabus prepared and is essentially followed every year for each class. This syllabus varies depending upon education board the school is affiliated to, be it state board or the national board etc.

This kind of varying curriculum creates some clear variance in the range of topics or the depth of topics known to children of different schools. This sometimes provides an undue advantage to those who have studied a given curriculum. For example the national CBSE board in India used to conduct the common engineering exam that was used to give admissions in elite engineering colleges in India and the score was also acceptable by most of the remaining engineering colleges. This provided an unfair advantage to those studying in CBSE schools as the syllabus was very closely bound to what was taught in their schools too.

However, there is a convent board that provides high quality education and provides a great all around English learning to those enrolled in these schools. Excising the existence of these different types of curriculums might kill off the adversity of specializations that these different curriculums offer and strip the people of the learnings that are important more important to them as decided by them.

Hence, it would be more optimal to look for a solution that mixes the flavours of different curriculums that the different boards agree upon and will closely shadow the same curriculum in their respective schools. This would be much better than enforcing a curriculum on whole of nation.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the depth of topics known to children of different schools. This sometimes provid...
^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nown to children of different schools. This sometimes provides an undue advantage t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, look, so, for example, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 255.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13725490196 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69048189187 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9538802794 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126451696137 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528276262802 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362303787516 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760228536598 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034914529497 0.0667264976115 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.