A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether having a unique national wide curriculum is beneficial to students before college. Indisputably, the same education may seem the justice around the country. Nevertheless, it may raise other problems and issues like the budget and different conditions of infrastructure across the country. Thus, I generally disagree with the point that all of the students around the country should receive the exact same national curriculum before they go to universities and would argue that there are some more parameters to be considered including; the every student’s talents, disabled pupils and their own problems to deal with and also some financial issues in large-scale.
First of all, this is an indisputable fact that every student has a distinctive interest and habit. To illustrate, one may dream of being a famous pianist, while the other wants to become a prestigious football player. In this circumstance, obviously, the merits of every individual are neglected and forced to learn some subjects they may not incline to. Consequently, those students with different perspectives may gain low marks and then lose their self-esteem and finally their unique potentiality may be forgotten.
Secondly, we should pay attention to the disabled students or even worse who are in deprived areas, to preserve social justice. For example, consider those who suffer from dyslexia, children who are blind, etc. They cannot keep up through the same curriculum at the same pace as others. Hence, all the evidence above demonstrates that there is not going to be an equal situation in the matter of public education, that is, it yields to a kind of discrimination between a group of disabled pupils and some others in the society.
Finally, there can be a situation where it is economically not possible for the nation to keep uniformity in the national curriculum. Specifically, when the cost of the infrastructure required to support the institutions and the cost to keep the adequate standards of education are not met by the budget of a particular state within the nation. Or, maybe a kid from a poor family may not be able to afford such an education. There is also a matter of cultural and dialect differences amongst the provinces which should be considered in those curriculums.
Admittedly, the students studying in rural areas would not face any problems in education and schooling from this viewpoint that they would get the same knowledge as compared to the students in a big metropolis. In other words, they would have the same skill sets, knowledge, and equal opportunities to excel further in life as compared to the other students. However, the above argument does not constitute sufficient support to claim that this approach is the one and only necessary way to achieve this goal. Because there should be some considerations about the budget and the disabled students or poor infrastructures in the deprived areas.
In conclusion, although a uniform national education material may be successful to make a more pioneer society, there are some other factors to consider in order to keep the performance on the top. As long as some measurements are performed, or some areas are involved we cannot absolutely agree with the claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 390, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... generally disagree with the point that all of the students around the country should rece...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2766.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 534.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1797752809 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99268982689 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503745318352 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 886.5 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9868619165 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.727272727 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22727272727 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186675247486 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528838242258 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464864177602 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952978444418 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041804418084 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.