Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
The statement talks about how natural sites should be presevered by passing legislations for it but emphasizes less on the growth for the economy of the country.
One can easily point out that, currently we are living in a industrialized arena, ever since the industrial revolution took place back in 1760. The concept of industrializtion presents enormous oportunities to countries and nations to flourish their way to economic solvency. Now, if we were to grow more industrialized, there is a certain toll to it. Forestlands are cut to make space for the giant plants. But no one can deny the importance of the industry building, even if it comes with a little cost.
However, Natural diversity is also important. I mean, after all, this is our home planet. If we go on destroying the mother nature, the result should not look good, as evidenced by recent examples of natural disasters all over the world.
Then again, with the tide of modernization and global sophistication, we can see countries spending billions of dollars to constructions of different kinds of infrastructures such as hotels, restaurants, theme parks etc. The revenue generated from these sources are humongous. So, if someone wants to keep competence, they ought to do the exact same thing. And what would that entail? destroying forestlands!
But, a balance between both can be achieved with a little dedication.
I think, to some extent, every country needs to be industrialized and they should make use of their greenlands to do so. Also, the revenue they should generate from the economic growth should be spent in a portion for the protection of the remaining lands.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nt out that, currently we are living in a industrialized arena, ever since the in...
^
Line 7, column 386, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Destroying
...same thing. And what would that entail? destroying forestlands! But, a balance between ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, then, after all, i mean, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 273.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08058608059 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05381607902 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.652014652015 0.4932671777 132% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 704.065955056 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.9021349626 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6875 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177617761766 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492165292248 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559195792884 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865664641601 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623130516989 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.