Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
The government of a country has to deal with tons of issues from smaller to larger scale. In the process of running the system smoothly, the government faces constant challenges. In fact, the problems are never-ending and so are the attempts to solve them. The prompt recommends that government should solely focus on the immediate problems at hand and not something that might happen in the future. In my opinion, I mostly disagree with this statement and argue that the anticipated problems should not be treated lightly for two reasons.
First of all, many people would argue that the imminent problem should get much attention than the potential ones because the first group has a short response period. This might be true, until we can think of an alternate explanation that, the problems at hand might be the cause of not paying enough attention to them while they were still potential. For example, the cyclone-prone areas in Bangladesh could be taken as an example. As a low-lying, seaside country, Bangladesh faces with many natural calamities, among which the cyclone is a prominent one. The damage due to this disaster is enormous. Even though there is weather updates and modern technologies to predict these events, the warnings are not taken very seriously. As a result, it causes greater and greater loss every year. This proves that, not taking the “anticipated” dangers very seriously, a lot of damage can occur, which includes social and economic loss.
Further, the future is not to be taken lightly, because with the passage of time, we will eventually get there. So, to think that the problems that might occur at a later point is not worth-the-attention at the present time is foolhardy because it might ultimately occur and there would be no measures to cut the impacts of those events. For instance, the issue of global warming or the climate change is very talked now-a-days. Although it is a gradual process, the symptoms started about 20 years back. In this interim, this issue has not been dealt with proper importance. Even today, the "guardian" countries of the world are paying minimal heed to this problem. As a result, today, the consequences are in front of our eyes. From polar ice caps melting to an overall increase in the Earth's average temperature, all these are the products of not taking precautions while there was still time. If some of the problems are deadly when occurred, th situation may turn out to be exceptionally So, this example illustrates that the anticipated problems actually give enough time to do something about it and not taking the chance would be unwise.
In conclusion, it is without a doubt that choosing priorities for a government in case of problem-solving is a complex and thought-provoking issue. But, nonetheless, the bigger weight falls upon the future problems. The impending problems should be taken with extra care so that it does turn into a mountain from what was once thought be a molehill.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 615, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are weather updates'?
Suggestion: there are weather updates
... this disaster is enormous. Even though there is weather updates and modern technologies to predict thes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 911, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...cautions while there was still time. If some of the problems are deadly when occurred, th s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, may, nonetheless, so, still, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2508.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02605210421 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94977046201 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537074148297 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 758.7 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 16.0 4.99550561798 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.1023130592 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.32 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.96 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240363530287 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596386150367 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767280767113 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168990353091 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10175734579 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.