Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Natural resources are depleting. Increasing population is adding more pressure on the environment because of which climate change and other ecological effects are becoming more prominent. If the wilderness areas are continuously used for economic purposes, all the resources found in the wilderness will be used up and more environmental effects will be evident. Therefore, it is a responsibility of nations to preserve the environment by preserving the wilderness.
Firstly, economic development does not necessarily require wilderness to be used. There are different ways in which economic growth can be achieved without harming the environment. If policies are made to ensure that the wilderness is not harmed for economic gain, people seeking economic gain will be pushed to seek new methods which would allow them to use the resources without jeopardizing the wild. We are in the twenty first century, and much work has already been done for sustainable development without impacting the environment. Therefore if people try, it is not entirely impossible to gain economic development without harming the wilderness.
Further, protecting the wilderness will also protect natural resources which can later be used for economic gain. For instance, there may be plants in the forest that have medicinal values. If the forest is protected and if the plants are utilized to develop medicine from them, the medicine can be sold to gain money. Thus, by protecting the wilderness in its natural state, natural resources can be protected, and the resources can in turn be economically propitious.
Opponents of the opinion that nations should protect the wilderness at any cost will argue that human development is more important, and it can only be achieved through economic growth. Although I concede that addressing human issues is the most important for us, using wilderness for economic growth will be extremely short sighted. Although it might seem lucrative to use natural sites for financial gain, in the long run when natural resources deplete and the environmental changes, it will be humans who will suffer. Thus, protecting the wilderness will be a long term investment for human good.
At length, it is crucial that we protect the environment along with the wilderness. Protecting wilderness will eliminate the chances of paucity of natural resources which will ensure long term prosperity. Moreover, at an age when scientific development has surpassed much of human expectation, it is certainly possible achieve prosperity without harming the wilderness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 419, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-first
...ut jeopardizing the wild. We are in the twenty first century, and much work has already been...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 540, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ment without impacting the environment. Therefore if people try, it is not entirely impos...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'for instance']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.205011389522 0.240241500013 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.20728929385 0.157235817809 132% => OK
Adjectives: 0.111617312073 0.0880659088768 127% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0478359908884 0.0497285424764 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0318906605923 0.0444667217837 72% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113895216401 0.12292977631 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0797266514806 0.0406280797675 196% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.9765595339 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0205011389522 0.030933414821 66% => OK
Particles: 0.00227790432802 0.0016655270985 137% => OK
Determiners: 0.0774487471526 0.0997080785238 78% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0478359908884 0.0249443105267 192% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0205011389522 0.0148568991511 138% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2574.0 2732.02544248 94% => OK
No of words: 399.0 452.878318584 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.45112781955 6.0361032391 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.416040100251 0.366273622748 114% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.365914786967 0.280924506359 130% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.263157894737 0.200843997647 131% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.19298245614 0.132149295362 146% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9765595339 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 219.290929204 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468671679198 0.48968727796 96% => OK
Word variations: 50.2630301963 55.4138127331 91% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.95 23.380412469 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1755188127 59.4972553346 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.7 141.124799967 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.95 23.380412469 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.674092028746 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 56.5414786967 51.4728631049 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.38888888889 1.64882698954 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351790863876 0.391690518653 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118587551714 0.123202303941 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0539309841327 0.077325440228 70% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.568941543924 0.547984918172 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.120392564847 0.149214159877 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147495942104 0.161403998019 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599557302078 0.0892212321368 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.428910157153 0.385218514788 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0219888870116 0.0692045440612 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240207076585 0.275328986314 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684083695765 0.0653680567796 105% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.30420353982 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 7.22455752212 180% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.