Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Developments over an wilderness areas often become hot potatoes around the community. People who advocate the plan expect higher income and growth in local industries, while those who oppose to it are worried about irreversible damage to the environment, which will bring unexpected avenges to human beings. Though in general further development of wilderness should be somewhat restrained by environmentalism, surely there are cases where we cannot avoid transforming nature.
It is true that current rate of exploitation over wilderness is alarming level. Amazon, the biggest tropical forest in the world, has been damaged by greeds of human beings. This massive, natural area was once called as the lung of the earth, but the respiratory function is now not as good as it used to be. trees were cut down for material supplies, and animals there perished due to the lost of habitat, some of which were killed for purpose of research and business. Environmentalists assert these are unethical with no doubt since human beings are sacrificing other lives for their own sake. Such examples are ample: Sahara desert is expanding due to the industrial developments of sub-Saharan areas, which implies reduction in tropical areas.
There are some cases where political decisions can achieve both protection of the environment and faster growth in economy. Without human activity, nature can rehabilitate its own function and lives can thrive again. Demilitarized zone, the buffer area between South and North Korea, has recovered its ecosystem since Korean War, and celebrated as the area where the nature of Han-peninsula is well-preserved. In addition to this environmental values, the military tension between two separate Korea generated unintentional economic values; researchers, documentary producers, and environmentalists are eagerly purchasing the records of behaviors of the animals living that region, expecting that such record can provide unique memoir of wilderness insulated from human activities over 60 years. However, we should be noticed that this logic for protecting environment is endorsing humans’ interests, not environment itself.
As history says, human beings always come first when making a decision, and they should do. Suppose we are so sympathetic to wilderness and lives living there that we consider them first for decision making. Unfortunately, though with good intention, in many cases it is unrealistic. For example, Chinese had once suffered from wild boars, snakes, and insects which harmed and killed many people until the Communist Party devised and implemented policies that protect its people from wilderness threats. Wilderness does not always mean beautiful, pristine scenery. Rather, it has been dangers to be controlled for the most people as a matter of survival. Recall how we drove out grizzlies, wolves, and other predatory animals and poisonous plants from our daily lives. Without proper plans, leave the nature alone might generate harmful effects to human beings, rather than secure them.
Discussions so far imply that though environment should be protected and preserved by human beings, that is because such decisions will be good for human beings, not because we should serve for nature itself. Unless developments backfire human beings currently or in the near future, human beings still possess power to make use of nature, they will, and there hardly exist means or reason to deter such activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
Developments over an wilderness areas often become hot potat...
^^
Line 7, column 677, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...matter of survival. Recall how we drove out grizzlies, wolves, and other predatory ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, still, well, while, for example, in addition, in general, no doubt, in many cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2942.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 535.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49906542056 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80937282943 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87142228602 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 311.0 215.323595506 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581308411215 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 924.3 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2190439234 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.583333333 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2916666667 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20609307538 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551076893865 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419481187612 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119950667403 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267750688604 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 166.0 100.480337079 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.