No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
Advancement in a dire need in every field of study. For progress to occur, a myriad of factors ranging from a scientific or social research to the input of an unskilled worker, has to be considered. The prompt states that unrelated ideas and opinions are required for growth in a certain profession to be telling. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this statement and argue that knowledge and skills from other fields are necessary for expedition in a specific field of study for two reasons.
To begin, development in any discipline is ever shifting, and the requirement for progress keeps changing over decades or perhaps millennium . Thus, to keep up with these changes solely on the knowledge from a specific field of study is one that will likely boomerang. For instance, the need of a farmer after continuous cultivation of land for food, changes from crop production to replenishing lost soil nutrients. This now requires expertise in both agriculture(soil and plant science) and chemistry to produce fertilizers. The use of soil fertilizers regularly affect the natural biodiversity and gives off greenhouse gases - which is detrimental to earth at large. Now, agriculture does not require experience in farming and chemistry alone, but in sustainability to save the planet, in economics to make profit and distribute food to consumers, in geography to determine where and when to plant, in biology among others. Farmers who did not incorporate knowledge from other fields as agricultural needs were changing will certainly experience a decline in crop yields and business. This example illustrates that various knowledge and experience outside agriculture is required for agricultural advancement.
Furthermore, even if we assume that the needs are not dynamic, that it is as unchanging as gravity, one should still take into consideration that one particular invention is related purely to one field. In the case of the enhancement of computers from super(large) to mini(pocket) computers, principles of integrated circuits, data storage, heat transfer and electronic communication necessary for this improvement runs across different fields and correlated which each other to achieve this advancement. This could be the reason prominent scientists were experts in more that one field like Albert Einstein(Physics and Mathematics), Marie Curry(Chemistry and Physics) and Da Vinci(Engineering, Botany, Psychology, Painting, etc). Their inventions and theories could be as a result of incorporating two or more fields. Research has shown that companies who give room to outside ideas from their workers or even the public tend to thrive better in a stagnated economic situation engendering progress in other aspects of the economy.
Of course, some may argue
Finally, there’s a saying in my language which translates to: For the right hand to be cleaned properly, the left hand has to be involved in the cleaning process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nging over decades or perhaps millennium . Thus, to keep up with these changes sol...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, if, may, so, still, thus, as to, for instance, of course, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2476.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39433551198 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14239820894 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581699346405 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 777.6 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1889629351 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.555555556 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231455175542 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738938304384 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078270468035 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100063293101 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850906847978 0.0667264976115 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.