Knowledge is vast, which means determining it's boundaries might sound bizarre. Every field of study is either implicitly or explicitly related to other fields of study. If this interdependence didn't exist, knowledge would have been stagnant with no advancements. When outsiders bring their own knowledge and experiences, this leads to a rapid growth in the corresponding field of study.
Firstly, when an outsider views the same problem, his approach is quite different from the approach chosen by the esteemed pundits in that field. He has his own outlook at the same problem and this might actually lead to a solution. For example, we are familiar with the buzz word 'artificial intelligence'. Is this field solely related to technology? Is this field more inclined to the field of biology? Well, this field emerged as a combination of the two, that is the technology enthusiasts wanted the computer to perform like the brain and the neurologists turned out to be a great pick to help achieve the goal. This demonstrates the fact that outsiders can bring their knowledge and their long experiences and indirectly help in the advancement in a field of study.
Secondly, every field of study should be open to ideas from outsiders because this facilitates a growth in a domain. For instance, no matter how many new physicists look at a problem, their methodologies to solve the same problem might vary a little but they converge. That is, their knowledge is confined to the boundaries of their experience only. Whereas, an outsider might suggest an alternative from his past experiences and contribute better to the field. Elaborating on the example quoted above, the field of cognitive neural networks is the combination of technology and biology. If not for the interdependence between the two fields, we might not have seen drastic progress in the field of neural networks.
Finally, it might seem that asking for opinions from outsiders is a matter of prestige and ego. The erudite class of scholars in a particular field of study might be hesitant to look for such opinions from others. Well, rather than seeing a field reach it's stalemate, it is better to always hear what the outsiders have to say. This could possibly result in advancements in that field of study.
Thus in conclusion, it is very important to incorporate the knowledge and experience of outsiders in any field, leaving one's ego aside because this could mean a huge success which couldn't be accomplished if either of the two functioned alone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dge is vast, which means determining its boundaries might sound bizarre. Every fi...
^^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ields of study. If this interdependence didnt exist, knowledge would have been stagna...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...r might suggest an alternative from his past experiences and contribute better to the field. Ela...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 334, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...ar what the outsiders have to say. This could possibly result in advancements in that field of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...advancements in that field of study. Thus in conclusion, it is very important to ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 121, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ence of outsiders in any field, leaving ones ego aside because this could mean a hug...
^^^^
Line 9, column 181, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...se this could mean a huge success which couldnt be accomplished if either of the two fu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2109.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04545454545 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88162735991 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502392344498 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5379965616 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8636363636 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04545454545 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437020852403 0.243740707755 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139724586074 0.0831039109588 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11496219188 0.0758088955206 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258168132366 0.150359130593 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754542430638 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.