This is a debatable topic whether any field of study makes any remarkable progress without help of outside branches of studies or not. Maybe there are subjects which are result of combination of core fields. I personally, however, believe that it cannot be said that all fields are result of outside knowledge. I would like to explore this in the following essay.
First and foremost, there are certain branches of subject which are dependent upon the knowledge of other branches of subject. For example, atomic physics, in order to have deep comprehension of this field one should have good understanding of chemistry and mathematics. To know about nuclear reactions, it is necessary to know about chemical periodic table and to calculate the energy of the reaction, mathematics is needed. Thus, atomic physics requires command of core subjects. Otherwise, it will be difficult to make advancement in this area.
Besides this, there are examples where a field does not require any help from outside fields. Mathematics is one such subject on which many fields rely. But, it is not seen that a mathematician needed some outside information in order to prove any theorem or to make hypothesis. Therefore, it cannot be asserted that all subjects are dependent on outside knowledge.
Lastly, savvy and erudite scientists from history made big discoveries and inventions without much apprehension of other fields. I would like to explain this with help of examples. Issac Newton invented calculus mathematics without dependence on other fields. Albert Einstein, father of theory of relativity, gave this theory by making observation of time and space. He performed imaginary experiments.
To conclude, it is not necessary that there is any reliability on other fields to make progress. While, there are branches of subject which are product of core subjects, on the other hand, there are fields which are making significant advancement without outside cognizance and experience.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, lastly, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 314.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34076433121 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86361698617 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522292993631 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9142518407 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.85 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147759956495 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443544974837 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507420392322 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962716577966 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589596368852 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.