one should only consider the positive points and ignore the negative ones
As the author’s claim that only considering positive points of an individual is an unsound thing as only considering positive things may lead’s to ignoring the weakness and history teaches us that ignoring the weaknesses lead certain individual into detrimental or fatal situation.
Taking an example of a cricketer who has a fear of bouncer delivered ball, just by ignoring his/her weakness does not accomplice him or her as a complete cricketer as taking a preventative step on weakness help an individual achieve something extraordinary in life.
Weaknesses are not confined to an individual but also for an organization where the loopholes are recognized and preventive steps are taken, examples of a company where the sales are declining, thus, recognizing the lacuna and weakness regarding the marketing strategies, operational strategies, can help an organization to increase its sales.
Weakness is a part of individual, were nobody is granted any mercy, every individual has a certain kind of loopholes or lacuna which he can carry forward with it or can work on it, to an author’s claim that one must only consider the positive point of a person and ignore the negative ones, seem unwarranted as only considering the positive point seriously dampen the overall growth of an individual and impede him or her to overcomes his or her weaknesses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 464, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her to overcomes his or her weaknesses.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, so, thus, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 58.6224719101 39% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 2235.4752809 52% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 219.0 442.535393258 49% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28767123288 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.55969084622 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15151865086 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 215.323595506 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561643835616 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 704.065955056 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 20.2370786517 20% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 54.0 23.0359550562 234% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.694699286 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 289.5 118.986275619 243% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 54.75 23.4991977007 233% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.21951772744 230% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232051909533 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142473252409 0.0831039109588 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133391111166 0.0758088955206 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142473252409 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133391111166 0.0667264976115 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 30.9 14.1392134831 219% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 8.21 48.8420337079 17% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 7.92365168539 201% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 25.5 12.1743820225 209% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.29 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.38706741573 123% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 100.480337079 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.8971910112 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 23.6 11.2143820225 210% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 31.0 11.7820224719 263% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.