one should only consider the positive points and ignore the negative ones
As the author’s claim that only considering positive points of an individual is ambivalent as only considering positive things may lead’s to ignoring the weakness and history teaches us that ignoring the weaknesses lead certain individual into detrimental or fatal situation. However, in certain condition ignoring weaknesses which are least important, benefit individuals to make a wise decision.
Taking an example of a cricketer who has a fear of bouncer delivered ball, just by ignoring his/her weakness does not accomplice him or her as a complete cricketer as taking a preventative step on weakness help an individual achieve something extraordinary in the history of cricket.
Weaknesses are not confined to an individual but also for an organization where the loopholes are recognized and preventive steps are taken, examples of a company where the sales are declining, thus, recognizing the lacuna and weakness regarding the marketing strategies, operational strategies, can help an organization to increase its merit in terms of sales and productivity.
For some instance author claim about ignoring the weaknesses seems valid. One must take a decision by considering the overall scenario of circumstance, for example, students preparing for an exam having a variety of subject, ignoring the subject which he or she is weak is a wise choice as ignoring it saves more time to horn the subject which have more weightage and focusing more on subjects which are considered as strength, definately help to get good grades.similarly in choosing a course or major in graduate school focusing more on subjects which have inane importance to your major subjects and choosing courses least relevance to your major subjects seems illogical, it's better to give no importance to a particular subject.
To sum up, weakness is a part of individual, were nobody is granted any mercy, every individual has a certain kind of loopholes or lacuna, with which he can carry forward or can work on it, to an author’s claim that one must only consider the positive point of a person and ignore the negative ones, seem unwarranted as only considering the positive point seriously dampen the overall growth of an individual and impede him or her to overcomes his or her weaknesses.secondly, ignoring the weaknesses which have trifling values help to make wise and fruitful decisions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
As the author's claim that only con...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... individuals to make a wise decision. Taking an example of a cricketer who has...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raordinary in the history of cricket. Weaknesses are not confined to an indivi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t in terms of sales and productivity. For some instance author claim about ign...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 626, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'courses the least'.
Suggestion: courses the least
...nce to your major subjects and choosing courses least relevance to your major subjects seems ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 748, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... no importance to a particular subject. To sum up, weakness is a part ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, thus, for example, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30870712401 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15973609091 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503957783641 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 20.2370786517 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 54.0 23.0359550562 234% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 201.071720375 60.3974514979 333% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 287.428571429 118.986275619 242% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 54.1428571429 23.4991977007 230% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 15.7142857143 5.21951772744 301% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222241519238 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106437078238 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108968428698 0.0758088955206 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125188793299 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114488234892 0.0667264976115 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 30.7 14.1392134831 217% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 8.21 48.8420337079 17% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.92365168539 184% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 25.5 12.1743820225 209% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.41 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.38706741573 122% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.8971910112 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 23.6 11.2143820225 210% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.