In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature.
Hard work and Imagination are the two key essentials for success in one's career and life. The prompt recommends all college students should be required to take poetry, novel, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature courses. In my opinion, I loosely agree with the prompt. The students should take some extra courses which give them a second perspective towards life.
For some students, it may be an unnecessary burden to bear in addition to courses related to their specialization. For instance, for a weak student who is barely able to handle the coursework related to his major, the additional courses on poetry, novel, and other imaginative literature will be overkill. The main priority of that student is to survive and those extra courses will exacerbate situations beyond redress.
On the contrary side, the conglomeration of the various different fields will lead to out-of-the-box thinking. The students which are the result of this suggestion will have a great imagination. A study conducted by the University of Amsterdam shows that students who took a variety of classes like mythology and poetry had a higher brain function compared to those who didn't. Higher brain function measures the person's ability to think out of the box when faced with hypothetical situations. This shows us that taking a variety of courses as suggested will be beneficial in the long term.
Furthermore, trying out different things can sometimes lead to a surprising result. For instance, a survey conducted by the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay stated that eighty percent of people found a new passion after taking several courses related to arts. The previous example demonstrates that trying a different perspective can sometimes lead to the discovery of newer, better ways to career and life in general.
Although there are a few negatives associated with this suggestion, the positives outweigh the negatives. There can be scenarios in which this suggestion doesn't hold true but for the majority of the population, it is good.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e the two key essentials for success in ones career and life. The prompt recommends ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...er brain function compared to those who didnt. Higher brain function measures the per...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...dnt. Higher brain function measures the persons ability to think out of the box when fa...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 155, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...n be scenarios in which this suggestion doesnt hold true but for the majority of the p...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, second, so, for instance, in addition, in general, of course, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 328.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26829268293 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90765441446 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3772027196 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.647058824 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258958189926 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766263238539 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105962304478 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133112249418 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110885129506 0.0667264976115 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.