As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
The rise of technology was an inexorable shift in the human history. While new innovations bring new ideas, jobs and new ways to approach the world, it nevertheless brings more reliance that in turn creates apathy, even aversion in people to think more deeply.
Looking at our daily lives, we see that technology has brought a lot of new gadgets to lessen our workload. Take the gadget calculator for example. In Bangladesh, students are allowed to use calculator for their exams from the 8th grade. Researches have found that many students who used to think a lot with their heads before the 8th grade think less after calculator is allowed to be used. By the 10th grade they are completely used to using the calculator and by the time they reach university, they want to do even simple calculations like adding 2 digit numbers in calculators and generally have an aversion to using their head even when it would be faster to do so.
Another example is the memory of the devices that we now use. Now that the memory capacity is really large and we can store things like our writings or formulas permanently, we no longer try to keep them in our head even simple formulas that'd help normal calculations. We are so reliant on different apps to keep track of things for us that we don't feel the need to remember things anymore that would be considered general knowledge otherwise.
We cannot, however disregard the importance of technology in our life by any means. The rise of technology has opened up new ways to think. To keep pace with the ever changing world and its innovations, we ourselves have to improve and thus we need to think better and faster than ever before. That by itself, utilizes the human mind to think more deeply that wouldn't be possible without these innovations.
Technology brings with itself a lot of reliance on it which inevitably has its downsides. This however, cannot undermine the importance technology has on our everyday life and the way it has improved our ways of thinking and learning. All of this ultimately depends on how we, humans, decide to use technology to dictate our lives, meaning whether we want to use it to its greatest extent to improve ourselves or do we want to be reliant on it so much that we lose our own thinking abilities and be nothing more than some unintelligent being.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that'd
...p them in our head even simple formulas thatd help normal calculations. We are so rel...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... to keep track of things for us that we dont feel the need to remember things anymor...
^^^^
Line 7, column 361, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...he human mind to think more deeply that wouldnt be possible without these innovations. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, nevertheless, really, so, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71951219512 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60199552762 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509756097561 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.5826681908 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.823529412 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1176470588 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147249586151 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566048614058 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462217059212 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978922540594 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610204520418 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.