Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are unwarranted, based on the existing evidence for global climate change.
Energy and resource shortage has become the burning point of debate in the last few deacades. In fact, even as we talk now, somewhere in the world resources are decreasing in an alarming rate which brings my opinion in this case closely matched with the position that states developed nations should reduce their energy consumption to lead a more sustainable lifestyle. However, this by no way means that developed nations should be the only ones temperating their methods where other parts of the world remains as profligate with their usage as they are now.
We need to look no further than our current states of non-renewable energy to determine the precarious state that humankind is in. Our natural gas and fuel pits are decreasing in number and some of the countries in the world need to depend on fuel rich countries as they don't have enough of their own. Additionally, as the world progresses and newer innovations are made, our energy consumption inevitably increases. This is most prominent in the developed countries where most of the innovations proliferate. However, that doesn't go to say that countries other than the developed ones should use energy as they please. Therefore, to improve the current dangerous situation while also thinking about our future generation, all of the countries in the world should try to minimize their energy consumption as much as possible.
The second position states that based on the extant evidences of global climate change we are fine in our usage of energy. But then we need to ask, exactly what are these evidences and till when can actually depend on them. Recent findings definitively denote that the world's resources are diminishing precipitously and ameliorating actions are exigent. Nevertheless, some people think that it is fine to go on spending energy as they are used to but when saying that, they are largely ignoring the several concerning facts and evidences that point to the contrary. In fact, these are the people that are apathetic to change and who don't want to think about the future as they are content with their current life. However, if all the people were to think like them then the day is not far when our civilization is decimated.
As the non-renewable sources continue to decline, we need to put more emphasis on the renewable sources to generate energy. Likewise, we need to improve already existing technologies like nuclear reactors and hydro-electric projects. However, the point in which all of our energy needs are met by the renewable sources only is very far away and until we are able to reach that point, we have no choice other than to depend on the conventional, non-renewable ones. And if we are to use energy as prodigally as we are doing now, that point where we switch to renewable sources will never come, seeing that we'll not have enough energy to sustain ourselves to that point anyway.
All things considered, in light of the current states and existing evidences, we can safely say that the way we are using energy now is largely deleterious to our survival. It not only falls on the developed countries, but rather on every citizen of every country to be a little more moderate in their usage of energy so there can come a day when we are looking at a bright, new future where energy consumption is not a factor to our survival anymore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... fuel pits are decreasing in number and some of the countries in the world need to depend o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...o depend on fuel rich countries as they dont have enough of their own. Additionally,...
^^^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... innovations proliferate. However, that doesnt go to say that countries other than the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 724, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...o thinking about our future generation, all of the countries in the world should try to mi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 634, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...le that are apathetic to change and who dont want to think about the future as they ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, anyway, but, however, if, likewise, look, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, well, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.3162921348 239% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 63.0 33.0505617978 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2785.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 571.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87740805604 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88831323574 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68694640073 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437828371278 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 909.0 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6555811486 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.619047619 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1904761905 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7619047619 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158366954367 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517308147809 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410934632189 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982917748117 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436499660188 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.