As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasonin

Essay topics:

As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The discovery of a light bulb by Edison and telephone by Graham Bell have been a life changing invention for the mankind. From satellites to even the smallest machines, what seemed to be a distant dream is a reality in today's time. Technology, inventions and discoveries are the result of human's cusrosity and creativity. These inventions have time and again come to mankind's rescue. Not only it has made our lives easier, it also help us to comabat the most difficult problems be it global warming or the depleting resources. The author here argues that since people are relying more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. While it true that technology has eased human life, by providing us with all the necessary comforts, in order to make any concrete statement it is necessary to not jump to any conclusion and look at the complete picture.
Electricity by far has been regarded as the greatest invention of mankind. Not only it made our lives easier, it has proved as a great energy source for places not accessible to human. It is true that our increased dependance on technology is a matter of concern, but what we fail to admire is the fact that all the inventions and devices are man made. It was the human brain which toiled retlessly for decades and centuries to find the greatest application of theoretical sciences and brought them to live. We need to realise that although we are becoming more and more dependent on the man made devices, at the same time human race is also working to out do itself and improve in all stratas of science and technology. Recent times have seen an increased interest in the STEM's and numerous RnD labs have been established in every nook and corner of the world. With the support and motivation of the governments technology is reaching new heights, and all this would not have been possible if the ability of humans to think themselves was deteriorating.
But we cannot neglect the fact the humans have increased their dependence on technology and the percentage of population who is actually directly invloved in research and development is pretty low. The pre-historic human who use to live caves, had more challenging day to day acitivities which required a great amount of critical thinking. The current generation did not have to face such problems. They got everything served on the platter. Take the example of increased usage of mobile phones. Kids these days are provided with mobile phones very early. Although it is necessary to walk with the fast paced world, it is necessary we see the long term harm these devices cause on the human brain. Earlier kids used to play outdoors which used to not only keep them healthy, but also inculcate the values of team work and brotherhood. The affects of the increased dependance of technology is something which cannot be ignored.
It is true that more and more reliance on technology to solve problems has many drawbacks, it is necessary to appreciate the positive affect of science in the development of the human kind. We must work to develop the applications of the theoretical sciences to best benefit of humans. In order to inculcate crtical thinking in humans, we must educate oursleves with the right and limited ussage of these devices. People should engage in more and more outdoor activities in order to have an overall development. Change is the only constant. Everyday brings with it a new development in the field of science and technology, which must be put to best use for the needy and helpless.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 432, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...y it has made our lives easier, it also help us to comabat the most difficult proble...
^^^^
Line 2, column 901, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... With the support and motivation of the governments technology is reaching new heights, and...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... pretty low. The pre-historic human who use to live caves, had more challenging day...
^^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the best'.
Suggestion: to the best
...pplications of the theoretical sciences to best benefit of humans. In order to inculcat...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 541, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: Every day
...velopment. Change is the only constant. Everyday brings with it a new development in the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 641, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the best'.
Suggestion: to the best
...ience and technology, which must be put to best use for the needy and helpless.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, look, so, while, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2973.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 615.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83414634146 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97987886753 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70592068288 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 295.0 215.323595506 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479674796748 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 965.7 704.065955056 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8117419055 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.517241379 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2068965517 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.79310344828 5.21951772744 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240490665466 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058266913837 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778160226534 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154267490525 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335736827946 0.0667264976115 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 100.480337079 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.