As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
This topic raises a controversial issue of whether relying on technology is deteriorating our thinking or not. While there may have some exception, in most cases new technologies give us the space for innovative thinking and brainstorming our mind. Thus I generally disagree with the opinion.
First of all, in this modern world, technological innovation and their importance in our daily and professional life is increasing rapidly. One of the most important creations of technology is computer. At first it was invented for the purpose of computation. But gradually the uses of computer spread out in different areas. Nowadays, computer is a useful tool for researcher and scientist. They can easily conduct their task and manage their research data by using computer. And surely this saves their time. So they can use that time of others critical thinking.
Furthermore, new technological innovation is the result of human thinking. So more technological advancement will encourage people to think about new ideas and conduct research regarding these ideas. For instance, current day’s computer scientists and programmer are researching in artificial intelligence, and if they will bring success then it will help them to spread their research in broader areas.
Again, another important modern technology is internet. Think about the days, when internet was not available. At that time people were wasting their time by gathering information from various sources manually. But now they can easily search about different information in internet and get the result quickly. So they are not getting bother with that type of simple task, and easily use their brain in much complicated and important task.
In addition, Technology makes our life easier. Whether it is a smart phone or a car or a microwave oven, we are getting advantage from all of these. By using smart phone we can easily communicated with each other by direct call or using other social Medias. A professor from Bangladesh can easily share his/her research ideas with a professor sitting in a room in other parts of the world. Without the innovation of technology, it would not be possible to seat in front of this computer and writing about a issue topics which will examined by a specialist from some other country. All these things, saves our times and provide enough space to think about new ideas and innovation.
In conclusion, I admit that, in some cases technology has its negative effect like much reliance on calculator deteriorate the ability of the students to do calculation by themselves. But the positive sides of technologies surpass its negative consequences
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ve thinking and brainstorming our mind. Thus I generally disagree with the opinion. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'communicate'
Suggestion: communicate
...ese. By using smart phone we can easily communicated with each other by direct call or using...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 505, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ront of this computer and writing about a issue topics which will examined by a s...
^
Line 6, column 38, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cases'' or 'case's'?
Suggestion: cases'; case's
.... In conclusion, I admit that, in some cases technology has its negative effect like...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, then, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in most cases, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2231.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23708920188 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9112079448 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525821596244 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6406912999 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6296296296 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7777777778 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.62962962963 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168681843003 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450659406574 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492509582514 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.092610478776 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639500243348 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.