As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. has been updated.
The issue that reliance on Technology will deteriorate the Human’s ability of thinking is a contentious one. While contingency on Technology has advantages and disadvantages, dependency on Technology won’t degrade the creative thinking of Humans, for new technological advancements come from the reliance on technology and Humans have to be more creative to solve the problems like pollution, deforestation etc., caused by technology.
Firstly, contingency on Technology led to advancement in Technology which is a result of Creative thinking. For example, consider the commute in olden days, if the wheel has not been invented, then there would not be any carts. Similarly, the invention of carts led to the invention of trains and cars etc. and the discovery of semiconductors like silicon revolutionized the electronics industry which led to invention of Computer and other important gadgets like Mobiles, Speakers etc., which is also a result of Creative thinking of Humans. Also, the invention of Bulb by Edison proliferated many advancements in Electrical appliances like fan, conditioner etc.
Secondly, reliance on Medical Technology induced the creative thinking which improved the Health Standards of people. Take Small pox as an example, in ancient days when there is no Technology to find the cure, small pox ravaged many civilizations. Now, it was eradicated because of vaccines discovered from the contingency on Technology.
Thirdly, creative thinking is required to solve the problems caused by technology. Problems like Pollution has to be solved by inventing the pollution free vehicles like electric cars. Nuclear power plants were invented to meet the demands of electricity and to tackle the problems caused by other ways of electricity production like Thermal power plants etc.
Some argue that the dependency on technology will deteriorate the creative thinking of Humans by pointing the E- Education platforms like "Byju" but these help in easy understanding of things only and if students understand the concepts, then they will think much more which indicates their expansive creative thinking.
In conclusion, the reliance on technology actually improves the creative thinking capability as shown in above explanations. Hence, dependency on technology will not deteriorate the thinking capability of Humans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...reative thinking. For example, consider the commute in olden days, if the wheel has not bee...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tes their expansive creative thinking. In conclusion, the reliance on technolog...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, third, thirdly, while, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 33.0505617978 18% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 353.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71388101983 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21536858316 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501416430595 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.721721113 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0625 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 5.21951772744 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209513734448 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743519381316 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712039896506 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12122656204 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814002314869 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 48.8420337079 66% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.1639044944 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.8971910112 147% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.