This topic raises the controversial issue of whether technology advancement and daily use will make the human thinking vanish. Indisputably, technology has its pros and cons. It certainly makes us idle. Nevertheless, it has become a necessity and we are not to be living without it. Thus, I generally disagree with the opinion that technology is made to make us think less and would argue that it does not has made us non-thinking living humans.
First of all, it is undeniable that technology makes us lazy and think less. I would like to point that the daily use of technology does make our minds useless and by that our thinking ability will surely deteriorate. To illustrate, let us look at the example of artificial intelligence it is the new tendency of technology improvement it is based on our preference and collects data about us, for instance when your phone does not ring if you are in a meeting or when you get on car, also, when it suggests what road you should take based on data. In this circumstance, obviously we are not responsible any more we don't think we just trust it blindly. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that it is controlling us and we don't take responsibility any more.
Furthermore, if not true then how come that people can't live a second without their phones. Specifically, the children they have become addicted to gaming even their homework can be solved by phones where is the learning process in all that. Both common sense and personal experience have told us that the more you rely on technology the more you become addicted and the less you are using your mind.
Admittedly, the main idea of using technology is to make us think less. This is true especially when it comes to people that need to focus more on their jobs than on basic thinking an architect for example cannot waste time on designing by hand and simulating by mind a computer helps by creating all of this in few hours all it needs is some guidance. However, the above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that technology use is beneficial. Because as much as it facilitates tasks it makes brain neurons become used to lazy work and dependency.
In conclusion, although technology comes handy sometimes, it cannot replace the human thinking, it was never meant to replace the use of our brains. As long as some measurements are performed, human thinking deterioration still holds. In fact, in the near future artificial intelligence will become more advanced and we will need to find solutions to this issue before that the world becomes no longer ours.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 407, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'have'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: have
...k less and would argue that it does not has made us non-thinking living humans. ...
^^^
Line 1, column 407, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...k less and would argue that it does not has made us non-thinking living humans. ...
^^^
Line 3, column 617, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...usly we are not responsible any more we dont think we just trust it blindly. Consequ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 722, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...bvious that it is controlling us and we dont take responsibility any more. Furthe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
..., if not true then how come that people cant live a second without their phones. Spe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, so, still, then, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 69.0 33.0505617978 209% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2153.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80580357143 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78365934824 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515625 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.4999822695 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.65 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35 5.21951772744 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269730746383 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074902627286 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526626327384 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145153033461 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214620455173 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.