As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
The issue mentioned above is a very debatable topic. Technology has it pros and cons and we can discuss it further in the following essay.
Lets discuss the cons, technologies was developed to make life easier for human being but it has somewhere made us more lazier. We depend on technologies for faster resolution, this has made us impatient and has also hampering our thinking ability. Like the advent of calculator, now a day the kids rely on calculator for faster calculation. This is somewhere deleterious for them as they will not have the habit of calculating. Schools wants to show that they are keep up with the technology so they have started allowing students to use calculator. Although this will improve kid’s productivity, they will be able to solve more problems but this will impact the kids ability to perform calculation without the calculator. We should not depend on technology so much that if it is taken away from us we become handicapped.
However, they are many benefits of technology. Like the advent of social media, it helps people connect with thousands of people. It will give us exposure to so many things that we would have been unaware of it there was no technology. Due to advent of automobile people can travel to places faster, this has improved the productivity of the people and helped human man-kind. A person can reach faster to his office with a car and do a lot more productive work and they can focus on building more better technologies.
It depends on human being on how they use the technology. If you are just using it to play games on your cell phone and always using it for petty calculation. It will hamper you. However, if you use it wisely and in fact you use it to be more productive in other task then technology is beneficial for you.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...t further in the following essay. Lets discuss the cons, technologies was deve...
^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'lazier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: lazier
...uman being but it has somewhere made us more lazier. We depend on technologies for faster r...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 670, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kids'' or 'kid's'?
Suggestion: kids'; kid's
... more problems but this will impact the kids ability to perform calculation without ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 493, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...ive work and they can focus on building more better technologies. It depends on hum...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... then technology is beneficial for you.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 316.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79430379747 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7315388114 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525316455696 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9037116655 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1666666667 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27777777778 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257014010187 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716272696956 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516931308016 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128189147373 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073688633468 0.0667264976115 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.