As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Technology is the dazzling fruit of an era that human stepped into his post-medieval period. When the people had the opportunity to get away from the quotidian and prosaic topics of their daily lives, they stared to think proactively and innovative gadgets were invented. This technology has been in serve of humankind since the very beginning and gave rise to phenomenon outcomes. Nonetheless, the recent trend of the applications of technologies are not as promising as it used to be. Some people think it is leading us to perish and halt us, the humans, from what we are, a genuine, as we have always been throughout history. The current observations actually confirm this point of view that people are unable to think for themselves due to relying too much on technology.
To begin with, a primary concern that is quite frightening is the rate of progressing in brand new technologies. In less than a decade or so, the new technologies are moving forward so rapidly that sometimes it is unconceivable how far it can get in the next decade. For instance, data scientists declare the total information that has been ever generated by humans get doubled almost every two years, since 2000s. The acceleration of the process is mind-blowing. Ever since the appearance of Google search engine has provided a huge amount of data for users, and despite the usefulness of the information that we can acquire from this eminent website, it has led people to rely completely on it. People are not tended to even think for a moment to a question they encounter with, and they immediately open up a browser page and search the issue to find the answer. I, as a person who espouse Darwinist, believe that through generations this will lead to disability of human being to think properly. What we have now, is the heritage of billion people lived before us, our ancestors, through thousands of years. People who thought and challenged the world around themselves and advanced their minds. But what is the remainder of us, the generation who spent a large portion of its day time on Instagram?
To add, besides simple search engines that engage ordinary people, there are highly functioning machines that help scholars and industry, but yet make them more dependent. The advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been a milestone of the century. After industrial revolution of Europe, factories equipped with steam-engine machines and they needed an operator. In this way operators were the brain and machines were the muscles. However, the current machines have the ability to learn and think. It turns out what would be the human’s role after all have done machines all the works? And there is a controversial topic herein about the rebellious potential of AI which is beyond the topic now.
To point out, it is axiomatic that how technology has helped humans to reach its present climax. However, the writer of this essay believes presently the technology are affecting humans’ thinking ability adversely.
To conclude, humans are less-likely to think as they used to do the same function before. The detrimental effects of technology are not yet blatant, but it can be considered as a raised alarm that humans should be aware of, and make them to think about their future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, however, if, nonetheless, so, after all, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2734.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 550.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97090909091 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8004067001 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 299.0 215.323595506 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543636363636 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 869.4 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8202254933 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.259259259 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3703703704 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.40740740741 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.83258426966 310% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247546547487 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558523597867 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462041393157 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131249169454 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394834975389 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 100.480337079 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.