A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter the college.
Since the dawn of civilizations, societies have always been engaged with their human resources. The people that incorporate a society are completely varied in their skills, expertise, and event their tempers and level of intellectuality. Therefore, a decent society might be the one who can properly manage this variety to employ the right person for the right place. The society starts to recognize the capability of each new members initially during the school period. Therefore, the curriculum should be set in a way that demonstrates people's ability to take part in different parts of the nation. As a result, I believe the same national curriculum that applies to every new member of society is a better benchmark.
Obviously, there are intrinsic characteristics in each person. Some people are good at math, some are more comfortable with arts. Everyone has experienced this issue during the school that children have different abilities. Thus, in order to reveal these abilities, and more importantly prodigies, all students should pass the same curriculum. In addition, the elites, people who can be the leading wheel of the society, can be found in this manner as well. On the other hand, it is a fundamental rule in an examination that to compare a series of objects and evaluate their appropriateness for a task, there should be some controlling parameters that would qualify the copious effective factors.
Another reason is that student will be well-rounded in this way. For instance, back in school children are more inclined to be involved in sports.
Although, it is not the best way and an optimum approach is probably to assemble both approaches that divide children into different parts and help them to find their future way based on their skills.
Consequently, it is not fair that student study different national curriculum. Also, some skills are necessary for living in a nation and in this way, children would be more prepare. However, the best approach can be an ensemble in which student should be divided into groups that help them find best remedy for their future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 721, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ember of society is a better benchmark. Obviously, there are intrinsic character...
^^^^
Line 3, column 698, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... qualify the copious effective factors. Another reason is that student will be w...
^^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
...ivide children into different parts and help them to find their future way based on their skills....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 344.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12209302326 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83606385332 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5424267163 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8888888889 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147730361744 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576653032388 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898169595632 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798705892449 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636437128456 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.