As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is apparent how advancement in technology, leads our generation towards a state of tranquality. It is not astonishing to see how the technology updates has aided humans in problem solving over decades. But one would certainly ask the question,”is the ability of humans to think for themselves detoriating?”. In my opinion, I would partially agree with the given statement and I would like to ascribe two reasons in support of the statement while one reason contorary to the given statement.
First of all, people have started relying on technology to solve their routine problems. This can be made apparent by considering one of the expanding fields of technology in modern times, “Artificial Intelligence” or AI. What AI does is, it enables user to input any mundane problems and answer this question based on experiences and earlier data stored over the internet. The question is analysed and relevant advises are put forward before the user. With the increase in marketability of artificial intelligence, people are becoming more and more stale. This is a clear indication of how people have stopped solving problems on their own and their thinking ability to solve problems is detoriating.
Again, people have stopped discovering answers to new types of questions on their own. This can be explained as follows. A study from a university in California has found that, aptitude problem solving skills among the students in the last ten years has plummeted. They asserted technology as a major reason for this downfall by certain examples. For example, a tool ‘Mathematica’ has been developed to solve complex integrations in no time. Traditional mathematicians spent days and sometimes even months trying to solve these integrations by themselves. On contrast, contemporary researchers use this tool to solve their problems. This leads to people becoming less creative and later fail to trun up to their expectations. In this wat the study states an imporatant conclusion of how technology is detoriating the human ability to think.
But a contrasting theory would suggest how this thing has not detoriated the ability of humans to think but actually aided to improve it in numerous cases. Considering the number of research documents published in a famous journal last year and comparing it with the number ten years ago, one can easily find that the number has quadrapled. Conclusion made by the journal authority was advancement in technology. With upgrading technology, scientists find it easier to solve the toughest problems and this provides them with time to solve the next part of the same questions. In some sense they tend to think more and on a wider aspect in a short period of time. This actually has enhanced thinking ability in a number of cases since they work through a number of problems in less time.
Concluding, one would always agree the bright side of technology and how it is helping researchers, but again based on the first two reasons,we can see how technology is detoriating thinking ability of human beings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is apparent how advancement in techno...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: ASK_THE_QUESTION[1]
Message: Use simply 'ask' instead.
Suggestion: ask
...g over decades. But one would certainly ask the question,”is the ability of humans to think for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
...ut one would certainly ask the question,”is the ability of humans to think for th...
^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: NO_SPACE_CLOSING_QUOTE[1]
Message: There should be a space after a closing quote.
Suggestion: ” is
...ut one would certainly ask the question,”is the ability of humans to think for them...
^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
...ans to think for themselves detoriating?”. In my opinion, I would partially agree...
^
Line 9, column 621, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome sense they tend to think more and on a wider aspect in a short period of time...
^^
Line 9, column 649, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... more and on a wider aspect in a short period of time. This actually has enhanced thinking ab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 711, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctually has enhanced thinking ability in a number of cases since they work throug...
^^
Line 11, column 141, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , we
...but again based on the first two reasons,we can see how technology is detoriating t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, so, while, for example, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2577.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 498.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17469879518 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0132822104 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495983935743 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 807.3 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6194636646 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1153846154 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.96153846154 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257188012537 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705025112274 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535121584145 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148477442868 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359992684607 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.