Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Victory is imminent to those who stay consistent and focused regardless of distractions by others. To have a long-lasting legacy, one must indeed have strong ideas, however not to the extent of being unshakable. I would partially agree with what the prompt suggests and would state two reasons in support of the prompt while one against it.
First of all,the ideas of any individual are developed based on his past experiences and present environment. If a person tenaciously sticks to his ideas, which might not be prudent in the given situation and disregards other people's concern, he would probably take a wrong decision. For instance, if the captain of a team of players insists the players to play always in their respective positions, disregarding the few players who suggest to change their positions so that every player can have a different perspective and a new and optimized assignment can be formed, the team captain is risking team's victory somehow. Hence his through ideology can be stated partially flawed. They might fail and lasting legacy will not be seen.
Again, the goal should be set and the person in charge should take into account criticism and suggestions from other otherwise he may fail. An example for above statement is the reign of Hitler in Germany. He was brutal and dictatorial in his actions and was invariably criticized by opposing parties as well as other countries. Heedless mostly took imprudent decisions belittling his friend and advisors. Ultimately this led to the downfall of his era. It is not true however that he would have continued his reign for an everlasting period, but evidences in history suggest that he would have won many more battles and expanded his hegemony if had he taken other's criticism seriously.
On the other hand, caring too much about people's opinions and criticism will also lead to the downfall or at worst a diminished effect. This is because the person will start vacillating between ideas and in the process, find himself in a state of quandary. For example, a mobile company in the recent past went bankrupt since all of its employees had divergent ideas for the forthcoming session. Meanwhile, the team leader gave authority to his members to form a correct decision where a disharmony was seen. This led to wrong decisions being taken in spate and finally caused the company to fall. Clearly, the vacillation of leader amongst various ideas is to be blamed.
In conclusion, I would say that the person in the process should look through his goals but also consider the judicial advises others might be giving him and analyze each of them carefully. Only then will he leave a lasting legacy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...pt while one against it. First of all,the ideas of any individual are developed b...
^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...y individual are developed based on his past experiences and present environment. If a person te...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'play'.
Suggestion: always play
... team of players insists the players to play always in their respective positions, disregar...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 623, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ptain is risking teams victory somehow. Hence his through ideology can be stated part...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, then, well, while, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2233.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97327394209 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64712050875 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563474387528 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4506901008 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4090909091 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.40909090909 5.21951772744 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13235183195 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371365391953 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0271355900589 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075413860778 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316960045627 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.