As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Technology is the main reason for the advancement of the human race. Depending on technology doesn't mean humans have started thinking less. Technology has advanced so much that, human has made impossibles possible. We can now see what's going on-on the microscopic level. If we complete the task using machines there will not be any errors.
People are relying on technology more and more. It may have impaired their ability to perform simple tasks, like easy calculations, but it doesn't mean that people have completely gone mad. Technology has made things easier and this gives us so much time to think about other issues. If we complete one task using machines we have much time to solve other problems. Humans have invented technology to make lives easier.
Using technology humans can solve more complicated problems, this gives chance to expand their thinking, learning new things, and open up a whole new world of more opportunities. This is a golden age for technology, people may have over-using it on daily basis but it surely has not affected the ability to think. On the other hand, take an example of our communication device, mobile. If it wasn't for mobile we would have been using pigeons to communicate, hurting those poor souls. Telecommunications has joined different worlds together, sharing, discussing, arguing new ideas. This only jas helped humans to think in whole new different ways, to become creative.
As we can see around us, we can't live without technology but it hasn't impaired our way of thinking.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...the human race. Depending on technology doesnt mean humans have started thinking less....
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...de impossibles possible. We can now see whats going on-on the microscopic level. If w...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hats going on-on the microscopic level. If we complete the task using machines the...
^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e tasks, like easy calculations, but it doesnt mean that people have completely gone m...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... much time to think about other issues. If we complete one task using machines we ...
^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...our communication device, mobile. If it wasnt for mobile we would have been using pig...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...vice, mobile. If it wasnt for mobile we would have been using pigeons to communicate, hurting t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...eative. As we can see around us, we cant live without technology but it hasnt im...
^^^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
... we cant live without technology but it hasnt impaired our way of thinking.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 58.6224719101 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 2235.4752809 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 254.0 442.535393258 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05511811024 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72635450116 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602362204724 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3105343023 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.5294117647 118.986275619 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9411764706 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.05882352941 5.21951772744 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295846586877 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101653655321 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119007773421 0.0758088955206 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162436600362 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790473353848 0.0667264976115 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.