People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively
The author wants to convey that the people should question the rules of the authority instead of accepting them passively.Here the the authority can be referred to the government, organisation, institution or society. As these bodies are governed by the elected or non-elected members and they impose the rules on the constituent members which are expected to be followed.
However, this sort of hierarchial mechanism engenders to many issues that are to be addressed. First of all, if the rules set by any authority violates the basic human rights of any constituent member or members then strictly those rules must be questioned and opposed straight away. Since the main aim of any organisation or institution must to be to protect the basic and fundamental rights of it's members and members should see that these shouldn't be violated.
Secondly, any organisation need to be accountable to it's members. Accountability brings transparency into the system thereby increasing the trust of organisation both inside and outside the organisation. So the organisation's rules must be questioned for what is intended or expected outcome from the rule. This also brings sense of responsibility among the members which increases the goodwill of the organisation.
That said, there are situations where it is best to not question the rules. In the matters of sensitive data it's better to not question the rules set by authority instead follow the rules for the overall good of the institution. Many of the countries where dynastic rulers or dictatorial rulers have shown a lot of progress when compared to the democratic rule.
Finally,the organisation is build on the fundamental of protecting and supporting it's members. For Organisation to progress the members should develop the sanity to question the rules of authority when they are violating the rights of the fellow members. They should also follow the trivial rules of the organisation for the development of organisation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Here
...ity instead of accepting them passively.Here the the authority can be referred to th...
^^^^
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...nstead of accepting them passively.Here the the authority can be referred to the govern...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...nstead of accepting them passively.Here the the authority can be referred to the govern...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
... aim of any organisation or institution must to be to protect the basic and fundamental...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...mbers and members should see that these shouldnt be violated. Secondly, any organisat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lity brings transparency into the system thereby increasing the trust of organisa...
^^
Line 10, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...red to the democratic rule. Finally,the organisation is build on the fundamenta...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, sort of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 315.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30476190476 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09668830496 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469841269841 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8119401829 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.4 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295154814623 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985832704876 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116852781938 0.0758088955206 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172458493024 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873698463505 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.