People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.
Taking a risky action will always have unforeseen consequences unless people are deliberately considering all the possible outcomes that they face once the action is taken. The chances of avoiding bad consequences and a really drastic outcome will be reduced based on the number of speculations people perform before doing any bold move. However, one can not always foresee all the consequences, so sometimes taking a risky action is the only way of finding out what will happen.
To begin with, the possibilities of different outcomes that one can face after a risky move can be many. But one can make sure that the outcome will be a successful one by analyzing all the possible ways it can go prior to taking the action. For example, when Apple launched the first version of the MacBook Pro, they did not just launch the product without thorough testing and reviews. In fact, they ran a huge number of stress tests, performance tests, and quality checks. And this was not enough, They even went ahead and took feedback from a lot of users with different computer needs and tried to make the product close to perfection until the day before its launch. And so when they launched it, it turned out to be revolutionary; thanks to the hard work done to make sure that it will be that way.
Furthermore, the assessment of all the consequences of a risky move will always prove out to be good. Another great example would be the new all screen phones that are coming to the market. The big companies like Samsung, Apple, and One plus are coming up with phones that just have a notch for the camera and sensors. However, there are some Chinese brands that have launched the phones that don't even have the notch for a camera. These phones have a mechanical moving part with the help of which the camera pops out from the top of the phone. Taking such a bold move turned out to be a great one because they asked many people to review their product and provide feedback before they launch it. And when they finally did, it turned out to be revolutionary.
Finally, no matter the odds of getting a bad result after doing something risky, people will not be 100% sure whether it will be a good or a bad move unless they take their chances. For example, Linkin Park, a rock band, is best known for their rock music. But every now and then, they release a song or two that is a completely different genre then what people expect from them. Surely, few of those songs turn out to be bad, but few turned out to be great hits, even winning best song of the year awards. Hence, in a few situations, people will never know whether it is a good idea or a bad to take the risk and go out of their comfort zone unless they give it a try.
In conclusion, people will increase the chances of getting better outcomes the more they try to analyze all the possible consequences that they can face. Although it is always a good practice to run both the best case scenarios and the worst case scenarios before taking a risky action, people can face situations where they can only find out the consequences once the action has been taken.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ands that have launched the phones that dont even have the notch for a camera. These...
^^^^
Line 7, column 262, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...is best known for their rock music. But every now and then, they release a song or two that is a c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, really, so, then, for example, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2558.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 565.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52743362832 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87542086881 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36090936339 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447787610619 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 800.1 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1983268562 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.217391304 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5652173913 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30434782609 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220456934343 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695692860471 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593033429143 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142678298425 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557025192016 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 48.8420337079 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.