People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position
When people decide their behavior about risky task, there are two types of people who first Consideration or first act. I agree that people should act at risky works after they are ruminative about the consequence. The one reason is that the tasks that are related to people`s lives is essential. The other reason is that the business that is related to people`s household is considered carefully.
Firstly, when people decide about people`s life, they should undertake the task because life is so important. People see life as valuable and noble. Therefore, the work that is related to life should be decided carefully. For example, when doctors develop new treatment, they should measure both the efficiency and setback that will bring to the patients. In this situation, considering the consequences carefully does avoid people from making a loss and helps them to optimize their benefit. Although the speed is slow due to spending long time on the decision, it is good way to decrease the risk. As a result, it could increase the chance of saving a life through thinking carefully about consequences.
Secondly, they should decide carefully since there are sometimes related to their interest that has to do with their household. The business work is always risky. So, when their decision brings about the loss, they may have trouble due to unemployment or financial loss. Therefore, their decision needs to be considered carefully. For instance, in Samsung, when the CEO decided whether the company invest in the car industry, they decided on impulse participation in the business. This was because their rival corporation, Hyundai, had succeeded in the car industry. The result was a fiasco and many workers lost jobs. That is, the CEO`s decision on impulse caused debacle and much loss. As a result, businessmen should decide carefully when they undertake risky action because many people could suffer from economical problems.
Of course, critics argue that thinking over the risky action too much may make a chance to fly away. For instance, in the business world, businesses need not only carefulness but also fastness. So, acute businessmen tend to precise predict and act fast through consideration. However, even businessmen decide fast not a consideration; the loss is large. In this case, businessmen already spend money, so they suffer from financial loss. On the other hand, when businessmen lose chance due to consideration, they do spend money yet and thus they don`t suffer from financial problems. So, although the time is more spent when people are consideration, it is better than losing money.
In conclusion, although people spend time on consideration, it is better than lost. The one reason is that the decision could decide whether life lasts. The other reason is that the decision could affect people`s households.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 815, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...n because many people could suffer from economical problems. Of course, critics argue...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 2, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld suffer from economical problems. Of course, critics argue that thinking o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, of course, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2428.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 461.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26681127983 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81556641406 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468546637744 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 743.4 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.10617977528 354% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9314030558 60.3974514979 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.9333333333 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3666666667 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160127986948 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465502816278 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416129909375 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099650574899 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340077965129 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.