“People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.”
There is a prevailed notion that decision makers shape the world. The term “Decision maker” could imply to anyone in this world. It could refer to the leader of a country, a manager of a company to an individual at home. Decisions help to achieve a set goal. It is imperative that an individual could be a good decision maker only if he makes an understanding of the situation surrounding him and considering various aspects regarding a decision. Therefore an individual who make decisions based on emotion and justify the decision made with logic are poor decision makers.
Decision makers shape the future. The way of creating a future, is to understand the needs required to make future better. It is a known fact that every individual has emotions. However, a vital factor that people forgot is that emotions are mercurial. Therefore, relying only on emotion hinders the important factor of understanding the situation. For instance, consider a situation wherein a CEO of a company has to make a decision to improve the profits of the company as a result of huge loss in the last fiscal year. He or she must consider various factors while making a decision to increase the profits of the company. These factors include improving the working environment of the company that could lead employees to work efficiently. Moreover, introduction of incentives could bolster and employee to work efficiently. These factors are the result of using logic by understanding the needs of the people. However, instead of incorporating these factors, if the man in charge decides to abide by emotions to stringent laws such as increasing the working hours and decreasing the workforce as per the performance of an individual to increase the profits later justifying on the logic that more number of hours and lesser workforce lead to more profits, could deliver opposite results on the long run. Therefore, a good decision maker must not rely only on emotions and should understand the circumstances to make a good decision.
Similarly, when an individual has to make a decision, it should be a logical one and not based on emotion. Emotions such as anger and hatred tend individuals to react hastily and quickly thereby making the wrong decisions. For instance, there are certain circumstances wherein an employee who performs well is deprived of a promotion and is awarded to a colleague. Situations such as these tend to lower an individual’s self-esteem and could react to a situation with anger. In such cases, people who makes a decision based on emotions are poor decision makers. There are some situations wherein, an employee tends to shout or yell and decide to quit, later justifying the decision of not being awarded the promotion. In such cases, emotions tend to make an individual believe that the he or she is treated unfairly. However, a good decision maker look upon these situations as a chance to improve themselves. They respond in a measured way, understand the reason of not being awarded the promotion and work on the goal of achieving it. This results in increasing the self-esteem and confidence of the individual which can reap benefits in their career.
However, certain decisions based on emotions could be effective, if a proper understanding is given into the situation. For instance, the decision of demonetization in India was a result of an emotion that saw every Indian being developed and creating a system wherein all its citizens could have economic benefits. However, proper understanding and logic was made to make such a process a grand success.
To conclude, it could be understood that decisions should be based on emotions could not achieve a required result as emotions vary within each human being. Therefore those individual who make decisions based on emotions and justify them later on the basis of logic are poor decision makers. However, proper understanding must be taken into consideration to make a good decision .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 460, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...g various aspects regarding a decision. Therefore an individual who make decisions based ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 91, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs required" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'requiring' or 'to be required'.
Suggestion: requiring; to be required
...ng a future, is to understand the needs required to make future better. It is a known fa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 787, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'he'?
Suggestion: the; he
...tend to make an individual believe that the he or she is treated unfairly. However, a ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 928, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a measured way" with adverb for "measured"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nce to improve themselves. They respond in a measured way, understand the reason of not being awa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 157, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... emotions vary within each human being. Therefore those individual who make decisions bas...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 378, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...to consideration to make a good decision .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 85.0 58.6224719101 145% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3323.0 2235.4752809 149% => OK
No of words: 655.0 442.535393258 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07328244275 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.05894927669 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94707768158 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.390839694656 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1071.0 704.065955056 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.9530777046 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7352941176 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2647058824 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421541976576 0.243740707755 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129239790784 0.0831039109588 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155558421286 0.0758088955206 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294861911499 0.150359130593 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116761250396 0.0667264976115 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 100.480337079 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.