Indeed, people who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. This can be clearly seen in many historical examples as well as in modern times.
Firstly, basing decisions on emotions does not mean that these decisions are well thought of. There are high chances that a person is emotionally charged, following a particular incident which has in turn influenced his/her decision making capability. Some people might argue that empathising with people in need is essential to make the correct decision but such decisions might not be practically applicable to implement.
Spending considerable time and resources on a particular decision is also not prudent. Often, decisions based on emotion are taken quickly but they neglect the cost associated and time required to carry these out. For example, if the president of a particular country club decides to distribute free food to the needy from the club's kitchen, without thinking rationally, it will add additional burden to the employees of the club. Food preparation and distribution will involve a few employees to work overtime. If not compensated for the same, there might be resentment among employees causing firction with the management. The president of the country club might justify his actions by indicating that social causes are a way of obtaining goodwill but as we can see, this is being done at the expense of employees.
A more wise decision would have been, to distribute leftover food from meals each day to the needy and destitues. This would have ensured zero wastage while meeting the end goal of giving back to society. Thus, poor decision making can be avoided if decisions are not only based on emotions but also logic and practicality.
Sometimes, people are remorseful, cross and even feel helpless while making decisions. A bigger problem at hand is if these decision makers are at powerful positions enough to impact a large number of people. Decisions, if only based on emotion will pose danger to each person in society. Hence, a large group of advisors are present during every such decision making process focusing on the rationale behind the issue being discussed. For instance, in healthcare systems, a vaccine can be tried on humans only after it has qualified certain criteria. Coming from an emotional perspective and pushing for the use of such a vaccine will not be helpful here as it will put the lives of various people at risk. In such a scenario, the justification of such actions will also be considered void.
Therefore, defending emotional decisions with logic afterwards, is an indicator of poor decision makers.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n in many historical examples as well as in modern times. Firstly, basing dec...
^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'clubs'' or 'club's'?
Suggestion: clubs'; club's
...tribute free food to the needy from the clubs kitchen, without thinking rationally, i...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 184, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... at powerful positions enough to impact a large number of people. Decisions, if only based on emo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2253.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15560640732 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74580090844 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3128387272 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.409090909 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8636363636 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95454545455 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33885409877 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107441210612 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126032583998 0.0758088955206 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228358062289 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107471479904 0.0667264976115 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n in many historical examples as well as in modern times. Firstly, basing dec...
^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'clubs'' or 'club's'?
Suggestion: clubs'; club's
...tribute free food to the needy from the clubs kitchen, without thinking rationally, i...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 184, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... at powerful positions enough to impact a large number of people. Decisions, if only based on emo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2253.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15560640732 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74580090844 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3128387272 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.409090909 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8636363636 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95454545455 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33885409877 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107441210612 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126032583998 0.0758088955206 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228358062289 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107471479904 0.0667264976115 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.