People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
I agree with the statement "people who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers" to a greater extent than I disagree with it.
One of my reasons for taking this stand is because the logic used in this method of decision-making is really superfluous to the decision and doesn't help the decision-maker to make better decisions. Making a decision using emotions instead of logic first means that the person is only trying to justify the decision he has already made. He doesn't actually evaluate the decision in a better way. Hence, he is likely to focus only on the pros of the decisions and not the cons. Logic should be used to evaluate decisions and not simply to justify them. An analogy that fits with this is like a person who wishes to build a house, made of poor foundation, then attempting to later on modify the building above the ground. The beautiful house would be nothing but a facade, since the foundation would make it crumble at the end.
Also, making a decision involves several factors. emotions are only a part of this decision. Hence, if one makes decisions simply based on emotions, he ignores lots of other germane factors, some of which may even be more integral to the quality of the decision made than the emotions which were considered.
Furthermore, emotions can be quite fickle. Hence, decisions made on them will tend to be equally fickle. For example, a decision made in anger, even when justified with logic later on is tantamount to conducting a post-mortem investigation. It doesn't reverse the damage made
However, in some cases, this argument may not always hold. Some decisions can actually be driven by emotion. For example, a decision about love. Individuals don't necessary choose who to love by logic. Emotions decide that. However, one would have to later on use logic to justify furthering such a relationship.
Another case where this might not necessary be true is where the decision-maker actually evaluates the decision, instead of simply justifying it. That way, emotion may drive the initial consideration of that decision, but the decision is not truly made until the pros and cons have been properly weighed.
Despite these, allowing emotions to drive decision-making is likely to lead to sentimental and whimsical decisions. Hence, individuals who make decisions in this manner are usually poor decision-makers.
Therefore, i agree with the statement that people who make decisions based on emotion and justify decisions with logic afterwards are more likely than not, poor decision makers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... really superfluous to the decision and doesnt help the decision-maker to make better ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...fy the decision he has already made. He doesnt actually evaluate the decision in a bet...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 50, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Emotions
...ng a decision involves several factors. emotions are only a part of this decision. Hence...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ducting a post-mortem investigation. It doesnt reverse the damage made However, in s...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...snt reverse the damage made However, in some cases, this argument may not always...
^^
Line 6, column 159, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ple, a decision about love. Individuals dont necessary choose who to love by logic. ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 12, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ually poor decision-makers. Therefore, i agree with the statement that people wh...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, really, so, then, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2193.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08816705336 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81480879668 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461716937355 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 717.3 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.7119035124 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.72 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.24 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.24 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473263424687 0.243740707755 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144256646555 0.0831039109588 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134087598638 0.0758088955206 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281611863048 0.150359130593 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155857999298 0.0667264976115 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.