People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Emotions are the differentiating factor between humans and machines. A human baby is born with the ability to express happiness, anger, anger, and pleasure. A lot of times people tend to make decisions based on emotions and not logic which they regret later. It has been observed that people who make decisions based on emotions and justify it later with logic afterward are poor decision-makers. An emotional person is more amenable as compared to someone who is logical most of the time. The logic provided by the decision-maker most of the time is to cover up the blunder they have made and not a well-thought opinion.
Making a decision can be a taxing process for some. People who have always been dependent on others for their smallest of the needs, find it difficult to reach any conclusions alone and tend to give their heart an upper hand at decision making over logical thinking. Many times, it can lead to competitors taking benefits from their situation. Consider, for example, a woman who has always taken her husband's opinion into consideration before deciding anything. It is obvious that once the husband dies, the woman will be unable to make strong decisions and can be taken advantage of her emotional state of mind. At such times people need to weigh logic over emotions and try to look at a bigger picture. For ephemeral comforts, one should not get emotional and take quick and unthoughtful decisions.
Many times it has been observed that the justification provided is a cover-up and not a well-thought opinion behind the conclusion. In order to hide their emotional side from the prying eyes, people tend to justify their reason with some made-up logic, thus ending up as poor decision-makers.
While it is true that people who reach conclusions based on emotions and not logic are not very good at decision making, but classifying them as poor decision-makers is a bit too harsh. For example, if a father forgives his only son who forged him to get money, it cannot be considered as a poor decision. The aged father also needs support at this critical period of his life and hence forgiving his son is a good decision. Many of us will call it a stupid decision, without acknowledging the fact that both of them are necessary for each other.
It is true that people who make decisions based on emotions are not good decision-makers but the thought process behind the decision should it cannot be considered before jumping to any conclusion. People who get swayed with emotion need to weigh logic more while making critical decisions or seek some help to not regret later. Logical thinking is always necessary to make the right choice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their situation. Consider, for example, a woman who has always taken her husband...
^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thus ending up as poor decision-makers. While it is true that people who reach c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, thus, well, while, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2216.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87032967033 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74988006237 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468131868132 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 704.7 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8842363688 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.727272727 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6818181818 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404193714563 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128843400786 0.0831039109588 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121823351654 0.0758088955206 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24849804897 0.150359130593 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101947380008 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.