People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Decision making is one of the most important skills that any individual can possess. In agreement with statement mentioned above, one can say that decision based on emotions, never gives good results. Most of the time people mix emotion and logic to take a decision and this definitely leads to bad outcomes.
Think before you do, is a popular saying which can be applied in this situation as well. Applying logic before taking any step is a better way to handle thing rather than analyzing a situation emotionally and making bad decisions. This can also be explained with an example of a company which had been incurring losses continuously for the past two and was on the verge of bankruptcy. During this time, a buyer was interested in buying the company irrespective of the current situation it was in. The buyer also guaranteed that the employees will not be losing their jobs. The owner of the company was emotionally attached to the company and was not ready to let it go. So, he declined the offer. As a result within 6 months the company shut down, later at a press conference the owner tried give a logical explanation as to why he didn't sell the company, when an offer was made. But none of his answers made any sense neither to him nor to the people who were listening to him. Making bad decisions often leads to a lifelong worth of rue.
Detaching one's self personally from a conflict then analyzing it, will definitely help make better decision. Let's take an example of a student who has been accepted to a prestigious college in Germany. Personally he never wanted to leave his family and friends in Brazil and go to Germany. But the student was smart enough to put all the emotions aside and think about his future and the opportunities that it can provide. So, he made a rational decision to pursue his career in Germany.
Thus, with the above mentioned statements and example one can definitely say that people who make decisions based on emotion and justify those with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 833, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...give a logical explanation as to why he didnt sell the company, when an offer was mad...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1041, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...often leads to a lifelong worth of rue. Detaching ones self personally from a co...
^^^
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...o a lifelong worth of rue. Detaching ones self personally from a conflict then an...
^^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...l definitely help make better decision. Lets take an example of a student who has be...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, thus, well, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70308123249 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56107286619 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53781512605 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6177021907 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3684210526 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7894736842 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.89473684211 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328138724056 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966298639088 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144314502802 0.0758088955206 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28462542958 0.150359130593 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.215563486431 0.0667264976115 323% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.