The author of the issue states that good decision makers should be the ones who evaluate different options with logic before making decisions, other than those who act based on their emotion. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general argument on this issue. I, however, to a great extent agree with the statement that we should think twice before we make decision.
By a large, it is established beyond doubt that we could ensure the qualities of our jobs as well as save a lot of time if we make a logical paln before we do something. As a tangible example, before getting to an essay, we, students or researchers, all need to choose our topic and focus based on logical analysis, which ensure that our directions are worthy and meaningful. What's more, we need to be clear that how we prove our assertion using our evidents and analysis logically. On the contrary, if we are only drived by our emotion, we tend to make a lot of useless demonstrations or just put a bunch of unrelative data in the essays, which may cause us lot of time but reward nothing. Indeed, resonable arrangement and plans not only improve the qualities of our work but also save our time and energy.
For a even higher lever, said, a country, making logical decison is vital. To elucidate more on this argument, let us image that if a leader, president or chairman, of a country, is a person who makes decision based on his emotion, how danger of the country would be: a small conflict on the border may lead to a war between two contries; a appropriate march will cause bloody suppression, etc. Things like these that can be solved by more gentle and resonable means may become disasters only because the decison maker may not in a happy mood at that time, and they are always invocatble since their influcence are huge. Fortunately, a modern society has created a more complex and reliable system to prevent indivudual leader from acting on his own will, which, from another aspect, demonstrates that how important a logical other than emotional decision means to us.
However, what I alluded to above connot be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with the innumerable benefits logical decison has, indisputable, although it will prevent us from doing wrong things, it will slow us down to catch the ephemeral opportunity. For example, if what Steve Jobs did was logically taking every possible situation into consideration instead of being led by his great intuition, Apple would not be what it is today. Nevertheless, what I want to rebuke is that examples like this are only the one out of a million, which could not be setted as models for us.
In light of the reason elaborated, I reiterate that a good decision maker should comprehensively analysis the situation berforehand and make decision logically, no matter it is for a individual person or for a whole country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...r directions are worthy and meaningful. Whats more, we need to be clear that how we p...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 5, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t also save our time and energy. For a even higher lever, said, a country, mak...
^
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...may lead to a war between two contries; a appropriate march will cause bloody sup...
^
Line 9, column 182, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...decision logically, no matter it is for a individual person or for a whole countr...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, for example, as well as, on the contrary, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2399.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 502.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77888446215 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74945504123 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53984063745 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 784.8 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.740449438202 405% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.5194310701 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.117647059 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5294117647 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188148028346 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610736116644 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593510472077 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120806638096 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608237111032 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.