People who pursue their own intellectual interests for purely personal reasons are more likely
to benefit the rest of the world than are people who try to act for the public good.
In society every people have different interest, goal, and ideas which are different from others. However, interest may differ but if the interest or the goal is not considered for the whole world success is fruitless. I agree with the author statement for some reason which is descibed below.
First of all, working alone for his owns personal interest a person may be a success but at the end the success will be no longer valid. It may be difficult to achieve a success considering the whole world but ultimately the success lasting forever. For instances, a researcher developed a portable drinking filter instrument and become successful with his idea. But, the validation of the instrument is questionable because the filter is not designed to considering the condition of the area. Moreover, the water condition is not known by the researcher does not consider the affordability of the filter. Thus, the invention may be successful for own interest but not for as a whole.
Secondly, a similar thing happens to the political issue. For example, India was ruled by the British for more than 200 years and became freedom in 1947. The great leader Mahatma Gandhi who was the pioneer of the movement. If he thought of his own interest and not working for the whole county then India could never be free. Moreover, this leader was so educated and he could live in another country and could make a comfortable life but, he chose the public interest and involved in the movement.
However, we all know about the Newton who was a popular scientist and the inventor of gravity. His invention was only for his own interest because he wanted to know why the apple falls in the ground. Though he was not thinking about firstly for the public benefit but, at the end it was a great invention and reveal so many mysterious knowledge. Another is Tomas Alfa Addison who was the inventor of the electricity. His invention was also of this own interest and he also inventor of more than a hundred of the new equipment. Thus, the invention may own interest but at the end if the invention is not public benefit it will be useless.
To conclude, every issue has pros and cons and we must carefully consider of such thing. If anyone tries to hard to introduce the better there is always something behind of it. However, personal interest is essential for the encouragement and if the benefit is not considered for the public the success is not efficacious.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 320, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun knowledge seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much mysterious knowledge', 'a good deal of mysterious knowledge'.
Suggestion: much mysterious knowledge; a good deal of mysterious knowledge
... it was a great invention and reveal so many mysterious knowledge. Another is Tomas Alfa Addison who was ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... must carefully consider of such thing. If anyone tries to hard to introduce the b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2032.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78117647059 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62297963113 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454117647059 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 643.5 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3233110554 60.3974514979 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.347826087 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4782608696 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5652173913 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274460989122 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821062816469 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629654581205 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154147345816 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170779132156 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.