People who see through ideas, not bothered by doubts or criticism, are bound to leave a legacy
All living beings are born to live. But some are born to inspire other to live. People look to them as inspiration and thus are regarded as legends in their respective fields. It is impossible for people who have reached the stage of legends not face any criticism. Thus I do not agree with the statement given here and my opinions are based on following 2 reasons.
Firstly, doubts or criticism play an important role in developing any human being. People are critisized atleast once in their lifetime. For instance when Galileo said that it is the sun which is stationary and the earth revolves around the sun, he was heavly critisized for his remarks by the church. As we see now that that statement has led many scientists to new discoveries about our universe. Had he not attempted to see through such an idea, he would not have been regarded as he is today. So it is not always true that people who just ignore criticism leave lasting legacy.
Another view is that when someone doubts his or her work, he will point out the shortcomings of their work. This helps in motivating the person to give extra weight to the shortcomings of his masterpiece and make another masterpiece. For instance Mahendra Singh Dhoni, former captian of Indian Cricket Team, was doubted for his wicketkeeping skills. He had a non-conventional style of wicket keeping which many of the critics not up to the mark. But as we know now that he is regarded as one of the Best Wicketkeeper ever produced in India and the world. Had Mahendra Singh Dhoni ignored the doubts people placed in him and not change his style he would have been long thrown out of the team. So doubts do help people get in shape and succeed in life.
One view is also that bad crticism should be ignored if one has to suceed and I agree with that statement. Cricism taken in a bad way can hamper the success path but that taken in the right context can do wonders. Hence leaving a lsting legacy depends on how one handle doubts or criticism.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...tage of legends not face any criticism. Thus I do not agree with the statement given...
^^^^
Line 13, column 122, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a bad way" with adverb for "bad"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...gree with that statement. Cricism taken in a bad way can hamper the success path but that ta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 215, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...en in the right context can do wonders. Hence leaving a lsting legacy depends on how ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, so, thus, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 360.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58888888889 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49425110609 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552777777778 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6770218112 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.6666666667 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47619047619 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185819365547 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524863839472 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644642666679 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102641449868 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263150463336 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 48.8420337079 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 12.1639044944 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.