A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.
Crime is an ambiguous term that can be used to characterize an eclectic range of illicit activities. While intentional crime breaks the basic human moral code of civility, crime in itself can't be generalized to have a common ground when discussed in the context of morality. A person who is found guilty of knowingly breaching a legal code of conduct should also have access to basic human necessities as denying a person irrespective of his social status; being a criminal in the discussed case, of his basic civil rights also amounts to breaching another moral code of conduct of humanity.
While there is no denying to the fact that a criminal irrespective of the severity of his crime, must be held accountable and punished accordingly, the severity of crime plays an underlying scrupulous role in deciding the extent of the punishment. As much as a cold-blooded murder can't be compared to a petty theft, punishments to such unscrupulous acts also vary in intensity. The primary intent behind the idea presented in the issue is based in the assumption that as soon as a person decides to step outside the legal boundaries of a society, he or she no longer deserves to enjoy the common grounds of the civil right as cherished by law abiding citizens.
It is the different circumstances, within which a person decides to give up the benefits one enjoys from such right, that question the viability of the idea. A petty thief might have a family of four and in the paucity of employment caused by government policies and or tumultuous financial conditions of a country's economy, decides to take the path of crime to fulfill his basic human needs. Such an implementation will not only deprive the criminal of his basic human rights but also will exacerbate the prosperity of his household leading ultimately to the demise of faith for law in his family and possibly within his close friends.
However, if a person is irritated by his office boss who asks the person to show up to work on time decides to take the life of his boss' son to prove a point and admits to not having any regret, such a person, who possibly suffers from psychological conditions stands to lose all of his civil rights.
In the light of given examples, the idea seems to be lying in a grey region between civil and penal morality. Since it is the merit of one's crime that should decide the severity of his sentencing, accordingly in the context of the severity of his crime and dangers he or she poses to the society, they should be stripped of their civil rights.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...moral code of civility, crime in itself cant be generalized to have a common ground ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 282, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...hment. As much as a cold-blooded murder cant be compared to a petty theft, punishmen...
^^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...enal morality. Since it is the merit of ones crime that should decide the severity o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 446.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70179372197 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74001397938 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482062780269 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 23.0359550562 161% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.3689066284 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.75 118.986275619 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.1666666667 23.4991977007 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272016465089 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933515054619 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657562629776 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152781490161 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347697783646 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 14.1392134831 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 11.2143820225 150% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.