A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.
Crime is a parameter which is used to judge a country for it's safety. A country with lowest crime percentage is termed as the safest. Whereas, a country with highest crime percentage is termed as dangerous to live in. If a person knowingly commits a crime, it could have been possible that he had a purpose or was in a situation to do so. We should understand the purpose of his doings so that we can take further action on whether he or she is eligible to have civil rights.
It could have been the case where a person knowingly committed crime to help someone in need. For instance, a person broke the traffic red light so that he could reach the hospital on time to save his mother who suffered a heart attack at home . So, instead of waiting for the ambulance, the person took the responsibility on his shoulders. He did know that he had committed a crime by overspeeding and driving past the red light. But, he had a role to play and he ultimately ended up saving his mother's life. For all we know is that the person might be a good person at heart and he would have been in a situation where he had to commmit crime to help or save someone in need.
On the other hand, such a person might be a criminal who does not take law seriously. If the person commits crime once knowingly, he or she might as well do it again. He or she is dangerous or vulnerable to the public. They can not be trusted. They have committed a crime purposely and would be well aware of the social implications which would follow. Not only have they broken the social contract, they have made themselves look vulnerable to trust again. It is blatant that they should not retain any right to benefit from his or her own labor as they knew what they were doing through their actions. If a person has committed crime for only his or her desires and not to benefit anyone, the civil rights of such a person should be withdrawn. Such behaviour shoud not be tolerated. It reflects casual behaviour of the person towards the law and also that he does not fear the doings of his actions.
To conclude, if a person knowingly commits a crime, he has broken the social contract but the purpose of the person shoud be evaluated. If the person was a altruist and did it for the benefit of the other, he should be vindicated. If, he or she did it to fulfil his or her own desires, the person is not liable to any civil rights and therefore the right to benefit of such a person should be revoked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the lowest'.
Suggestion: with the lowest
...dge a country for its safety. A country with lowest crime percentage is termed as the safes...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...ermed as the safest. Whereas, a country with highest crime percentage is termed as dangerous...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ther who suffered a heart attack at home . So, instead of waiting for the ambulanc...
^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n shoud be evaluated. If the person was a altruist and did it for the benefit of ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 33.0505617978 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.30818965517 5.05705443957 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4172138675 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.396551724138 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 632.7 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1312608703 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2916666667 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388105825229 0.243740707755 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111852392721 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108737405365 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258156377709 0.150359130593 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126615854624 0.0667264976115 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 14.1392134831 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.72 12.1639044944 63% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.