Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa

Essay topics:

Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.

The given argument states that Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have been found near a village named palea. But, recently the woven basket was found in lithos, a village across brim river from palea. Hence, it is assumed that that woven baskets do not exclusively belong to palea. There are a number of presumptions made in the argument which need to be sought so that the integrity of argument is not diminished.

It is assumed that since the woven baskets were only found in the village palea earlier, it would have been made by the palean people. However, it could be possible that the palean people were gifted woven baskets on some occasion. It might also be the case that, a salesman would have arrived at the palea and sold the woven baskets to the palean people. Archaelogists discovered one woven basket in lithos a vilage across brim river from palea. They have concluded that woven baskets are not uniquely palean. This might not hold true. As, it is very much possible that a person from palean village would have migrated to lithos.

It is stated that the brim river is deep and broad and hence, the people of palea would have crossed it only by a boat. During summers, it could be the case that the water is evaporated and water levels start to decline. Due to global warming , temperatures during summer are already soaring high. So, it would be viable for the people of palea to swim or even walk across the low water levels of brim river The argument has stated that no palean boats have been found. People of palea might have travelled through the boats of lithos which might sail daily from palea to lithos and lithos to palea. Since there is no palean boats found, it would be possible that the paleans would have traded boats for house in lithos which the argument fails to answer.

The argument needs to provide us with some evidence so that we can arrive at the credibility of woven baskets. It needs to answer whether the woven basket found from lithos was originated from palea? Does during summers, the water levels of river brim decline which make it easy for people to cross it and we do not need a boat in that case?

Did paleans trade the boat for house? Are there any boats from lithos which travel daily to and from lithos to palea.

Votes
Average: 6.3 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 52, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...quely palean. This might not hold true. As, it is very much possible that a person...
^^
Line 11, column 86, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... start to decline. Due to global warming , temperatures during summer are already ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.6327345309 127% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 13.6137724551 147% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 28.8173652695 118% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 55.5748502994 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 2260.96107784 85% => OK
No of words: 411.0 441.139720559 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65693430657 5.12650576532 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17184053712 2.78398813304 78% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.39902676399 0.468620217663 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 596.7 705.55239521 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 4.96107784431 282% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.749819395 57.8364921388 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 119.503703932 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6818181818 23.324526521 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.70786347227 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 18.0 5.15768463074 349% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.67664670659 299% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315301450844 0.218282227539 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115204304157 0.0743258471296 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121558494194 0.0701772020484 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127369857529 0.128457276422 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13223650642 0.0628817314937 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.3799401198 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.3550499002 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.5979740519 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.32208582834 83% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 98.500998004 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 411 350
No. of Characters: 1845 1500
No. of Different Words: 157 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.503 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.489 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.115 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 113 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 60 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 30 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 15 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.682 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.188 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.364 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.354 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.534 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.107 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5