A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor
The assertion recommends us to uphold a person's civil rights if he commits a crime knowingly. I mostly disagree with the prompt one must not go unpunished if the person attempts a crime which he is fully aware, but a person wouldn't commit a crime unless there are certain situations, I would like to support my claim with two reasons.
To start with, if a person knowingly commits a crime there must be a strong motive behind it, one which makes him to do awful things. To illustrate, consider a well renowned hollywood actor Jessy Smollet. He plotted a hate crime against himself, He made himself get attacked by his own bodyguards because he want public to have sympathy for him. Inturn, this can help him in getting high paid check. Finally, jessy was caught by police and got arrested for the crime. A person like him shouldn't be using his rights again.
On the contrary, many black hat hackers commit crime knowingly, but they do it basically for public interest. For example, consider recently published "Panama leaks" hackers found many politicians doing shady things like, public money laundering, illegal constructions, proscribed trading of animals. Even though, hackers committed a crime they did it for public welfare. Hence, people who commit crimes for development of nation shouldn't get stripped of their civil rights. Instead, reasonable thought should be given for them.
To conclude, people don't commit crime unless there are some external factors. one must not jump to conclusions directly, instead reasonable thought must be given for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
The assertion recommends us to uphold a persons civil rights if he commits a crime know...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...e which he is fully aware, but a person wouldnt commit a crime unless there are certain...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...tacked by his own bodyguards because he want public to have sympathy for him. Inturn...
^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... getting high paid check. Finally, jessy was caught by police and got arrested fo...
^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...rested for the crime. A person like him shouldnt be using his rights again. On the co...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...commit crimes for development of nation shouldnt get stripped of their civil rights. Ins...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 21, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... given for them. To conclude, people dont commit crime unless there are some exte...
^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...unless there are some external factors. one must not jump to conclusions directly, ...
^^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sonable thought must be given for them.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, if, so, well, for example, on the contrary, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 58.6224719101 39% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 258.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13178294574 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63139189478 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639534883721 0.4932671777 130% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 704.065955056 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.0770509103 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2666666667 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201957016524 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737708941457 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673613876589 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119635325836 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538866305199 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.