Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
"Don't judge a book by its cover"--one must not jump to conclusions immediately by looking vapidly.The prompt recommends us to convince that women with their inherent physical differences can't do better compared to men in many tasks. I mostly disagree with the assertion, while men may look superior in their traits, but women outperform many men in various divisions. I support my response with two compelling reasons.
To begin with, one field where women punch above their weight is on track field, where women completely outstripped men. To illustrate, recently concluded 1000 meter track record is held by Antonio Cortez, she is regarded as an epitome for both men and women. She has an incredible gift of running hard and fair, many men athletes appreciate for her athletism. Even now no other women or men came close to her record. This illustrates us about how one's fitness shouldn't be judged by gender.
Moreover, recently conducted surveys explains women has high critical thinking than men. This statement can be comprehended by referring to a fact that many high professional jobs are indeed occupied by women. For example, Women are the leading seat takers as CEO of numerous IT,Science firms. some renowned firms like Infosys,Adobe is headed by women.
On the contrary, one may concede that making women do all the heavy weight work is often regarded as remark in the society, so men conceding with the remarks often do all the heavy work. To conclude, women must not discriminate with their traits, they shouldn't be treated biasely, equal importance should be given for both men and women.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Don't
'Dont judge a book by its cover'--one mu...
^^^^
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...clusions immediately by looking vapidly.The prompt recommends us to convince that w...
^^^
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ith their inherent physical differences cant do better compared to men in many tasks...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... response with two compelling reasons. To begin with, one field where women pun...
^^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...r record. This illustrates us about how ones fitness shouldnt be judged by gender. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...s illustrates us about how ones fitness shouldnt be judged by gender. Moreover, rece...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fitness shouldnt be judged by gender. Moreover, recently conducted surveys exp...
^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Science
...eading seat takers as CEO of numerous IT,Science firms. some renowned firms like Infosys...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...rs as CEO of numerous IT,Science firms. some renowned firms like Infosys,Adobe is he...
^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Adobe
... firms. some renowned firms like Infosys,Adobe is headed by women. On the contrary...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...like Infosys,Adobe is headed by women. On the contrary, one may concede that ma...
^^^
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...ay concede that making women do all the heavy weight work is often regarded as remark in the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ot discriminate with their traits, they shouldnt be treated biasely, equal importance sh...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, moreover, so, while, for example, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 2235.4752809 61% => OK
No of words: 266.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10902255639 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75172818926 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639097744361 0.4932671777 130% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 704.065955056 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.1706872894 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0714285714 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336532199056 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107617414569 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680457117629 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195921661023 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383993126268 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.