A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.
A convicted criminal, no matter for what reason they have been convicted, but if their sentence allows them to be once again a part of the society then it would not be ethical to hinder their rights. A criminal can commit a crime for multiple reasons and there's no certainty of whether or not they will fall back into their own detrimental habits. Respecting the right that we as a society has assigned to every person living within the society it is necessary to work on a stringent but not deleterious basis.
The convicted person might have become a miscreant to support his family and saw no better means to serve their family. The person might be the only source of bread to the family and deemed committing a felony appropriate. People like such, who knowingly commit a crime, but have a survival-based motivation on their back must be given a chance to put their life in order. They need to be taught on the ethical ways of living in a society, and maybe should be given a bit of financial support to achieve stability.
However, the scenario I have mentioned above might not be the case of every person. There are some minds who work in contorted manners. These people commit a crime for no moral reason like manifesting a terror attack and some are just evil-minded people who like to create chaos. It won't be a good idea to allow such weeds to thrive in society because of the risk they carry around with them of the lives and property of other people. They need to be kept under minimal conditions so that they don't achieve the wiggle room to do ant other detrimental tasks.
Man can sometimes lose their way in the constant race of getting success in life. When the point comes to the brink of survival, they believe crime is their way out of this misery. But this capricious thinking can be treated and it is possible to kill the virus residing in their conscious which opts for malfeasance rather than hard work. A man should be allowed to learn from his mistakes and should try to learn how to live life in a better way. Rather than snatching away their rights but providing them an opportunity to rebuild their character and redress their mistake can prove helpful to both the convict and the society.
Thus, it is necessary to provide someone with a second chance in their life after they are made aware of the effects their action has on society and having them atone from it. But this has an exception because sometimes it is just necessary to exterminate a pest rather than trying to cure the field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...commit a crime for multiple reasons and theres no certainty of whether or not they wil...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...iple reasons and theres no certainty of whether or not they will fall back into their own detr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t under minimal conditions so that they dont achieve the wiggle room to do ant other...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56483516484 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40391139629 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516483516484 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0182256527 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.315789474 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9473684211 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36842105263 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118103969547 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405555359206 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355029841303 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.067315137713 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305333707458 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.8420337079 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.