A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.
Civil rights have been the backbone of any democracy. All citizens of a democracy are supposed to enjoy the civil rights bestowed upon them by the constitution. One of the primary civil rights is the right to benefit from his or her own labor. This right ensures that a citizen is well paid for his or her work in the economy irrespective of his or her background.
I fully agree with the author on removal of civil rights from a person who has knowingly committed a crime. The primary reason being that a nation should not bestow civil rights on a person who has endangered the security of a country knowingly. There can be numerous examples which can be cited to support this claim.
Consider the example of a politician who enjoys highest form of civil rights in the form of using state machinery for its personal benefit. Any politician who has breached the law with full knowledge about its implications, should be stripped of any civil rights. If such tainted politicians are allowed to retain civil rights, then it will set a poor example of judicial dealings in such cases.
Another example is of a bank robber who has endangered the nation's security to the maximum possible extent. Allowing such a bank robber to retain civil rights is like allowing anti-national elements to have a free run in the society. This is definitely going to endanger the nation's security.
The above examples demonstrate that allowing criminals to retain civil rights is the most disasterous thing that can happen to a democracy where the citizens look upto the constitution to protect themselves from fraudulent activities. Civil rights form the basis of such a protection which entitles a civilian to raise their voice against any atrocity which has happened by breach of constitutional laws. Thus it is highly essential that the sanctity of such rights be maintained to protect the nation from its abuse by anti-national elements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 42, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'enjoys the highest'.
Suggestion: enjoys the highest
...onsider the example of a politician who enjoys highest form of civil rights in the form of usi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 60, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...of a bank robber who has endangered the nations security to the maximum possible extent...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 276, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...his is definitely going to endanger the nations security. The above examples demo...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 406, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...pened by breach of constitutional laws. Thus it is highly essential that the sanctit...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, then, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 326.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95398773006 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74830363509 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506134969325 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6603134511 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.9375 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.21951772744 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422451288458 0.243740707755 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150017479644 0.0831039109588 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126431937556 0.0758088955206 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228698430876 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109179197515 0.0667264976115 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.