The purpose of education should be provide students with a value system, a standard, a set of ideas—not to prepare them for specific job.
The speaker claims that the goal of education is to provide students with a value system, a standard, and a set of idea, but not preparing them for jobs. In my view, the scope of the speaker is too narrow, as far as an educator’s concern, there are other aspect of purposes that a sound educational system need to achieve.
To begin with, I concede that one of the purpose of education is to teach people, including scientific theory as well as a range of ideas in different fields. We born as a baby, without any knowledge pre-established, therefore, an educator acts as a crucial role to enlighten use. Teachers at school help us learn and assimilate knowledge that rarifies thousands years of wisdom of human beings, by systematic and efficient way. These things seem unrelated to preparing people for future jobs.
However, at the same time of learning things, we have stepped out our first step to fit ourselves into future jobs. Teachers not only indoctrinate people with sophistication but propagate the value system that helps people fit themselves into the mainstream society. For example, at the elementary school, we learn proper manners from teachers and, from the interaction with siblings, we know how to politically cooperate or against to others. These things are indispensable possessions that adapt us into labor markets or cooperating with other people to accomplish a job.
Furthermore, despite the impalpable knowledge sets, some school even designed for training people for jog. The vocational school, which train people with practical skills, is one of example that mainly focus on preparing students for specific job. Students in the school will do the hands-on learning. The department of electronic engineering in vocational school tell students how to assembles electronic devices such as computers or robots. In the department of architecture, students will be trained how to sketch a blueprint for a building as well as some skills to construct a house. The main purpose of learning these things is well-prepare students themselves into specific job but not for theoretical things.
To sum up, the goal of education is not only restricted in providing general and theoretical things as the speaker mentioned, although it is one of important things. More often than not, it helps us develop skills and manners that is necessary in the society and labor markets.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'aspects'?
Suggestion: aspects
... an educator’s concern, there are other aspect of purposes that a sound educational sy...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'bore'?
Suggestion: bore
... range of ideas in different fields. We born as a baby, without any knowledge pre-es...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, such as, as well as, in my view, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2015.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 391.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15345268542 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90932379407 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531969309463 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3659629172 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.944444444 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7222222222 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358812842986 0.243740707755 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107780618439 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130343538916 0.0758088955206 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186962718428 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140003880497 0.0667264976115 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.